Thread: [tcltk-perl] Newest version
Brought to you by:
hobbs
From: jeff <je...@ro...> - 2009-11-18 18:22:57
|
Thanks for the response. Just signed up for the list. I'm a full time perltk programmer on Linux and I would like to try out the hooks into tcltk ( tcltk-perl or Tkx ) as an alternative. Where can I download the lastest tcltk-perl - CPAN seems a little old and there was some talk of a newer version. Thanks. Jeff |
From: Konovalov, V. (Vadim)** C. ** <vad...@al...> - 2009-11-19 09:00:38
|
> I'm a full time perltk programmer on Linux and I would like to try out > the hooks into tcltk ( tcltk-perl or Tkx ) as an alternative. > > Where can I download the lastest tcltk-perl - CPAN seems a little old > and there was some talk of a newer version. Hi Jeff, Gisle Aas has some very interesting activity at http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm , this is the current repository for Tcl perl module. Current repository for Tcl::Tk is http://code.google.com/p/perl-tcltk/ John Cerney implemented there a much better perl/Tk compatibility for Tcl::Tk, so this is also very interesting to see. Best regards, Vadim. |
From: Gisle A. <gi...@ac...> - 2009-11-22 21:04:38
|
On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:44 , Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote: >> I'm a full time perltk programmer on Linux and I would like to try out >> the hooks into tcltk ( tcltk-perl or Tkx ) as an alternative. >> >> Where can I download the lastest tcltk-perl - CPAN seems a little old >> and there was some talk of a newer version. > > Hi Jeff, > > Gisle Aas has some very interesting activity at http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm , this is the current repository for Tcl perl module. Which reminds me that I would like to see a refresh of the CPAN module. I went off doing other stuff and forgot about this. Do you mind if we just make the current HEAD in the http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm repo the "official" Tcl.pm-0.98? I think it's good to go (still needs to update Changes). --Gisle |
From: Konovalov, V. (Vadim)** C. ** <vad...@al...> - 2009-11-24 02:04:28
|
> Which reminds me that I would like to see a refresh of the > CPAN module. I went off doing other stuff and forgot about > this. Do you mind if we just make the current HEAD in the > http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm repo the "official" Tcl.pm-0.98? > > I think it's good to go (still needs to update Changes). thank you for your help, I've just made the release. Unfortunately, we've dropped the 5.6 support - is there anything in update that was really a feature of 5.8? And I think some 65% of documentation could be just dropped. Ok, we'll see how it will be :) Best regards, Vadim. |
From: Gisle A. <gi...@ac...> - 2009-11-24 06:19:21
|
On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:42 , Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote: > Unfortunately, we've dropped the 5.6 support - is there anything in update that was really a feature of 5.8? No, that's not intentional if it actually works on 5.6. The entry I added for META.yml was mostly a placeholder to show how to declare this. Let's change it to 5.6 then. I think all of the new code should work fine with 5.6. --Gisle |
From: jeff <je...@ro...> - 2009-11-24 14:49:45
|
Recently join both these mail lists tcl...@li... tc...@pe... Don't seem to get copies via tcl...@li... and the on line locations I'm looking in seem incomplete or not up to date. I'm using: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=tcltk-perl and http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.tcltk/ respectively. Am I looking in the right locations? Thanks. Jeff |
From: Gisle A. <gi...@ac...> - 2009-11-24 18:46:26
|
On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:42 , Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote: >> Which reminds me that I would like to see a refresh of the >> CPAN module. I went off doing other stuff and forgot about >> this. Do you mind if we just make the current HEAD in the >> http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm repo the "official" Tcl.pm-0.98? >> >> I think it's good to go (still needs to update Changes). > > thank you for your help, I've just made the release. I've now synced up the Git repo with what was in your release <http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm/commits/0.98>. I wonder what to do about the 'ChangeLog' file that's not maintained any more. Should we just delete it or replace it with the 'git log' output? Tip: For the next release you should try to create the dist package with a more recent version of MakeMaker. This is needed for the additional meta-data to make it into the META.yml file. This will create links to the repository and mailing list from the search.cpan.org/dist/Tcl page. That page would then also say something better than "Unknown" about the license. --Gisle |
From: Konovalov, V. (Vadim)** C. ** <vad...@al...> - 2009-11-24 19:34:14
|
> I've now synced up the Git repo with what was in your release > <http://github.com/gisle/tcl.pm/commits/0.98>. thanks! > > I wonder what to do about the 'ChangeLog' file that's not > maintained any more. Should we just delete it or replace it > with the 'git log' output? Yes, I think both approaches are just fine. > > Tip: For the next release you should try to create the dist > package with a more recent version of MakeMaker. This is > needed for the additional meta-data to make it into the > META.yml file. This will create links to the repository and > mailing list from the search.cpan.org/dist/Tcl page. That > page would then also say something better than "Unknown" > about the license. Yes, I saw the warning message about "LICENSE" keyword. I used perl 5.8.8, whereas I had choice of using both 5.10.0 and 5.10.1. Thanks for clarification. Best regards, Vadim. |