Re: [tcltk-perl] Why is Tcl a subclass of Tck::Tk?

[Gisle A. <gi...@Ac...>]

"Jeff Hobbs" <je...@Ac...> writes:

> We are all in agreement - my perl fu is just not up to the
> task of doing this quickly.  I was thinking that Tcl::Tk and
> Tcl::pTk should be separate modules, instead of the odd (to me)
> 	use Tcl::Tk q(:perlTk);
> that is there now.

A separate module is cleaner.  I would actually prefer that, but it is
certainly an API change.  If we then end up with two ways of doing
this because we need to stay compatible I rather just keep as it is.

--Gisle