Menu
▾
▴
tcllib-devel
|
From: Andreas K. <aku...@sh...> - 2005-10-18 01:01:06
|
What is the general opinion of the state of Tklib ? Does it contain enough stuff to make the initial release ? If yes, also enough to declare it version 1.0 ? Or should it be 0.4 ? -- So long, Andreas Kupries <aku...@sh...> <http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/> Developer @ <http://www.activestate.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Arjen M. <arj...@wl...> - 2005-10-18 06:33:58
|
Andreas Kupries wrote: > > Subject: [Tcllib-devel] Tklib state ? > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:00:19 -0700 > From: Andreas Kupries <aku...@sh...> > To: Tcllib Development <tcl...@li...> > > What is the general opinion of the state of Tklib ? Does it contain > enough stuff to make the initial release ? If yes, also enough to > declare it version 1.0 ? Or should it be 0.4 ? > I think we should make an initial release, and make it 1.0. Perhaps it does not have all the goodies we would like, but the present state of being in CVS only is very unsatisfactory. If people can download it and use it as easily as Tcllib, then we will see more requests, bug reports and so on (at the very least we will see more users). Regards, Arjen |
|
From: Andreas K. <aku...@sh...> - 2005-10-25 06:16:09
|
> > What is the general opinion of the state of Tklib ? Does it contain > > enough stuff to make the initial release ? If yes, also enough to > > declare it version 1.0 ? Or should it be 0.4 ? Ok, nobody answered beyond Jeff and Arjen. Based on that the consensus is to make a release. There was no consensus regarding a version number, so I have to decide. My opinion is that what we have is not really enough for an 1.0 release yet. Thus I am going with version 0.4. Today I committed a number of changes moving the tklib SAK tool forward, fixing small version differences, adding release information, etc. Pre-release archives of tklib-0.4 can be found at http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.kit http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.zip http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.tar.gz http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.tar.bz2 Please give them a whirl. Note: The only module in tklib which has a testsuite is plotchart. So there wasn't that much to check. We might wish to check that all version information (package indices, code, documentation is correct and in sync). The Tklib CVS is hereboy considered ** frozen **. Please do not commit _anything_at_all. If something is committed between now and making the final release I am more willing to undo such changes before tagging the release than adding the change to the release. -- So long, Andreas Kupries <aku...@sh...> <http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/> Developer @ <http://www.activestate.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Michael S. <sc...@un...> - 2005-10-31 10:24:24
|
Andreas Kupries wrote: >>>What is the general opinion of the state of Tklib ? Does it contain >>>enough stuff to make the initial release ? If yes, also enough to >>>declare it version 1.0 ? Or should it be 0.4 ? > > Ok, nobody answered beyond Jeff and Arjen. Based on that the consensus > is to make a release. There was no consensus regarding a version > number, so I have to decide. My opinion is that what we have is not > really enough for an 1.0 release yet. Thus I am going with version > 0.4. > > Today I committed a number of changes moving the tklib SAK tool > forward, fixing small version differences, adding release information, > etc. > > Pre-release archives of tklib-0.4 can be found at > > http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.kit > http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.zip > http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.tar.gz > http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.tar.bz2 > > Please give them a whirl. Note: The only module in tklib which has a > testsuite is plotchart. So there wasn't that much to check. We might > wish to check that all version information (package indices, code, > documentation is correct and in sync). > Some minor comments (for the tar.gz version): - In the plotchart module too many files have an x permission set in the tar file, same goes for ctext - The style package has neither tests nor docs. - tkpiechart demo.tcl should probably be moved to the toplevel examples subdir? - some files in ctext dir seem obsolete (install.tcl for example) Michael |
|
From: Andreas K. <and...@Ac...> - 2005-11-02 19:35:57
|
> > > Some minor comments (for the tar.gz version): > - In the plotchart module too many files have an x permission set in the > tar file, same goes for ctext This has to be fixed in CVS I guess. How ? 'cvs admin' ? > - The style package has neither tests nor docs. We know. Does not impede the release. > - tkpiechart demo.tcl should probably be moved to the toplevel examples > subdir? True. Does not impede the release. > - some files in ctext dir seem obsolete (install.tcl for example) Does not impede the release. Please convert these nits into low- to mid-priority bugs. -- Andreas Kupries <and...@Ac...> Developer @ http://www.ActiveState.com, a division of Sophos Tel: +1 604 484 6491 |
|
From: Andreas K. <and...@Ac...> - 2005-11-02 20:05:54
|
Csaba of tablelist had some comments about the pre-release as well, sent directly to myself. Incomplete list of contributors and bad stuff in the .tap file ... I have committed fixes for these problems and generated new pre-release archives. http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4-1.kit http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4-1.zip http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4-1.tar.gz http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4-1.tar.bz2 -- Andreas Kupries <and...@Ac...> Developer @ http://www.ActiveState.com, a division of Sophos Tel: +1 604 484 6491 |
|
From: Jeff H. <je...@Ac...> - 2005-10-19 18:49:59
|
> What is the general opinion of the state of Tklib ? Does it > contain enough stuff to make the initial release ? If yes, > also enough to declare it version 1.0 ? Or should it be 0.4 ? My vote is 0.4. Jeff |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X