From: Cameron L. <Ca...@ph...> - 2007-05-16 15:28:19
|
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:09:54AM -0400, Kenny, Kevin B (GE, Research) wrote: . . . > All that Microsoft has done is to *threaten* suit in a press release. > Even the number and distribution of the patents mentioned in the > release were taken from a report from Open Source Risk Management. > If Microsoft wants to go around threatening to sue its customers > (how many deep-pocketed open source users aren't mixed shops, anyway?) > it is committing corporate suicide in a particularly painful manner. > OIN, backed by IBM, Sony, Philips, Novell, Red Hat, NEC, and > Sun, is waiting in the wings to attempt to enjoin Microsoft from > infringing on the hundred or so patents in its portfolio; if > Microsoft actually fires a shot in this war, several commentators > have compared the likely result to "patent Armageddon", where > everyone sues everyone else and nobody can ship product until > the legislature intervenes. > > In any case, it's virtually impossible even for a well-heeled > corporation to do due diligence on Microsoft's seven thousand or > so issued patents (to say nothing of its pending applications). > Until and unless Microsoft identifies the specific patents for > which it claims infringement, it's all posturing. > > Stephen Vaughan-Nichols of E-Week has a fair summary of this non-story: > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2129586,00.asp . . . SJVN's great, of course. Here's more: <URL: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070515125107293 >; and especially <URL: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070513234519615 >, where PJ warms up with the heavy artillery square on-target. |