From: Jeff H. <je...@ac...> - 2006-08-14 16:24:07
|
Andreas Kupries wrote: > > Andreas Kupries wrote: > > > The new proposal basically provides communication channels with an > > > option to set an interpreter for execution. This is the link command > > > of the original proposal. The implementations of safeBasic and safe > > > commands of the original become so trivial in the new scheme that > > > providing special commands for them is not worthwhile. I.e. > > > > > > comm::comm new FOO -interp [interp create -safe] > > > or comm::comm new FOO -interp [safe::interpCreate] > > > > > Looks good. Just rename -ipevents option to -interp_events or > > -ievents. > > What is the problem with 'ip' ? 'ip' has different achronym connotations. Just using -events would work as well, since it is contextual. Jeff |