Re: [Tcllib-devel] A proposed new package ... Asking for comments.

[Hemang L. <hl...@ci...>]

Andreas Kupries wrote:
> The new proposal basically provides communication channels with an
> option to set an interpreter for execution. This is the link command
> of the original proposal. The implementations of safeBasic and safe
> commands of the original become so trivial in the new scheme that
> providing special commands for them is not worthwhile. I.e.
>
>        comm::comm new FOO -interp [interp create -safe]
> or     comm::comm new FOO -interp [safe::interpCreate]
>   
Looks good. Just rename -ipevents option to -interp_events or -ievents.
> The protocol command of the original proposal also reduces to 'create
> an empty interpreter and set aliases into it'. For the case of linking
> the aliases to a second interpreter 'interp alias' is still the best
> way of doing it, reducing this further to 'create an empty interp'. We
> can do a command for that, this is however quite general and unrelated
> to comm. Anybody with an idea where to place such command ? (Maybe a
> package "interp" ?)
>   
Can you provide an example of how you intend to use this. As such, it
could be just a sub-command "comm::comm link ..." but I can't say much
without understanding how it is going to be used.
> +
> +This isecure setup can be changed by the user via the two options
>   
Typo: isecure -> insecure.

Hemang.