Re: [Tcllib-devel] A proposed new package ... Asking for comments.

[<dg...@ni...>]

Quoting Andreas Kupries <and...@ac...>:
> I prefer the former actually, keep comm itself focused on the communication
> aspects, and use the proposed package for the linkage to useful execution
> environments.

I'm not a comm user, and I haven't carefully read all
of these messages, but at arms length it sure looks like
you're inventing a set of commands that would be good
additions to the comm package itself, rather than another
separate package.  I think that means I'm agreeing with
Hemang.

That said, if more direct experience indicates this really
should be a separate package from "comm", then give it
a name separate from "comm" as well.  This nested namespace
stuff is anti-modular.

Just IMHO.

DGP