Re: [Tcllib-devel] Tklib state ?

[Michael S. <sc...@un...>]

Andreas Kupries wrote:
>>>What is the general opinion of the state of Tklib ? Does it contain
>>>enough stuff to make the initial release ? If yes, also enough to
>>>declare it version 1.0 ? Or should it be 0.4 ?
> 
> Ok, nobody answered beyond Jeff and Arjen. Based on that the consensus
> is to make a release. There was no consensus regarding a version
> number, so I have to decide. My opinion is that what we have is not
> really enough for an 1.0 release yet. Thus I am going with version
> 0.4.
> 
> Today I committed a number of changes moving the tklib SAK tool
> forward, fixing small version differences, adding release information,
> etc.
> 
> Pre-release archives of tklib-0.4 can be found at
> 
> 	http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.kit
> 	http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.zip
> 	http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.tar.gz
> 	http://www.purl.org/net/akupries//soft/clt-arch/tklib-0.4.tar.bz2
> 
> Please give them a whirl. Note: The only module in tklib which has a
> testsuite is plotchart. So there wasn't that much to check. We might
> wish to check that all version information (package indices, code,
> documentation is correct and in sync).
> 
Some minor comments (for the tar.gz version):
- In the plotchart module too many files have an x permission set in the
tar file, same goes for ctext
- The style package has neither tests nor docs.
- tkpiechart demo.tcl should probably be moved to the toplevel examples
subdir?
- some files in ctext dir seem obsolete (install.tcl for example)

Michael