Re: [Tcllib-devel] Regarding SourceForge, the Tcllib CVS, and transitioning somewhere.

[Andreas K. <and...@ac...>]

On 4/26/2011 6:03 AM, Gerald W. Lester wrote:
> On 4/26/11 2:20 AM, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> have we reached a conclusion for this issue yet? (My most pressing
>> need at the moment is the development of a new version of Plotchart,
>> which I am developing together with Torsten Berg)
> Arjen,
>
> According to my email log TclLib was going to follow Core and use fossil.
> I'm not sure why the leap has not been made yet.

Sinking under my radar over time.

>
> Andreas, if this is correct -- do we have a schedule for making the jump?

My apologies. We do not have a schedule.
Right now I also do not have time for this, due to donuts eating it up.

> Also, are we going to use the  fossil bug tracking or stay with the SF bug
> tracking?

I would stay with the SF tracking. We can transfer an SF bug database to fossil 
just fine by now, in terms of data translation. However integration of old 
references in the changelogs and such isn't fully there yet, and our most 
experienced person in that area (Kevin) counsels against, at least not before 
the default setup in fossil got an overhaul. Which he, unfortunately doesn't 
have time for.

-- 
Andreas Kupries
Senior Tcl Developer
ActiveState, The Dynamic Language Experts

P: 778.786.1122
F: 778.786.1133
and...@ac...
http://www.activestate.com
Get insights on Open Source and Dynamic Languages at www.activestate.com/blog