Re: [Tcllib-devel] Regarding SourceForge, the Tcllib CVS, and transitioning somewhere.

[Kevin K. <kk...@ny...>]

On 04/26/2011 09:03 AM, Gerald W. Lester wrote:
> On 4/26/11 2:20 AM, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> have we reached a conclusion for this issue yet? (My most pressing
>> need at the moment is the development of a new version of Plotchart,
>> which I am developing together with Torsten Berg)
> Arjen,
>
> According to my email log TclLib was going to follow Core and use fossil.
> I'm not sure why the leap has not been made yet.
>
> Andreas, if this is correct -- do we have a schedule for making the jump?
>
> Also, are we going to use the  fossil bug tracking or stay with the SF bug
> tracking?

My $0.02:

Please stay with SF bug tracking.  Fossil's bug tracking isn't ready.
I say this as probably the guy with the most experience transferring
a bug DB from SF to Fossil. The transfer works, and I'm quite confident
about the data integrity, now and moving forward, but the UI and
workflow are both in need of some serious love and I don't have time
to put in the necessary work.

-- 
73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin