From: Kevin K. <kk...@ny...> - 2011-02-16 02:27:13
|
On 02/15/2011 01:04 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote: > Regarding the core assumption behind the argument, of git not being good on > Win, that I can't really evaluate. I haven't used git very much and not at all > on Windows. Git sort of works on Windows, but you have to install a ton of other stuff first, and I'd practically have to virtualize to do it (cygwin conflicts and the like). Fossil is a single executable on Windows and works just as well there as it does on Unix. My only annoyance is that it cannot be configured to do line-ending substitution. One of these days I'll do some scripts to work around it; I understand drh's reluctance to have the capability in the fossil mainline, given that the committed version of a file must be bit-for-bit identical to what the developer presented. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin |