Re: [Tcllib-devel] Regarding SourceForge, the Tcllib CVS, and transitioning somewhere.

[Arjen M. <arj...@de...>]

Hi everybody,

On 2011-02-15 08:58, Steve Landers wrote:
> On 15/02/2011, at 3:41 PM, Harald Oehlmann wrote:
> 
>> Am 15.02.2011 02:10, schrieb Andreas Kupries:
>>> On 2/14/2011 4:36 PM, Will Duquette wrote:
>>>> It probably makes sense to adopt whatever is adopted for the Tcl core.
>>> Gerald Lester made the same point in direct mail.
>>>
>> Same opinion, tcllib is tcl - keep it close.
> 
> Same opinion, with one caveat. Make sure the Tcl core developers keep the needs of Tcllib developers in mind too.  Or (put differently) the decision isn't only about maintaining C code in the core.
> 

I have no strong opinions one way or the other, except that I have
experience with fossil, not with git. It seems quite sensible to adopt
the same solution as for Tcl, but Steve's remark does raise a question:
how would the needs for maintaining C and for maintaining Tcl differ?
And how would that influence the decision for either?

Regards,

Arjen
 

DISCLAIMER: This message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and destroy this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
The foundation 'Stichting Deltares', which has its seat at Delft, The Netherlands, Commercial Registration Number 41146461, is not liable in any way whatsoever for consequences and/or damages resulting from the improper, incomplete and untimely dispatch, receipt and/or content of this e-mail.