From: Johann O. <joh...@go...> - 2009-11-01 11:52:22
|
Hi Larry, I would like to pack you up in your opinion and would vote for 2.) - as it sounds more clean logic for me. Also regarding version handling, it's easier to maintain tcllib / tklib separately, without the need to raise a version here *and* there. Rgds. and have a nice sunday, Johann On Nov 1, 2009, at 5:55 AM, Larry W. Virden wrote: > I had two thoughts while reading the paper today. > > 1. there's a third mode of the package that might be useful - > basically, a text version of the package, except when an error arises, > when, at that point, the interactive tk widget would open up as a way > for the user to provide missing info or correct something wrong. > > 2. I wonder if the interactive mode is so integrated into the package > that it would be better for the whole package to be a part of tklib, > rather than tcllib. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and > stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Tcllib-devel mailing list > Tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcllib-devel |