From: Jeff H. <je...@ac...> - 2009-08-07 16:00:27
|
On 07/08/2009 12:21 AM, Harald Oehlmann wrote: > If there is for example a new widget which has an implementation for > BWidget and TWidget, I would not mind to develop BWidget and release a > new version. Maybe, it might be senseful, to for example have the same > widgets in a BWidget 2.2 and TWidget 2.2 release (same release number, > same widget set). FWIW we (at ActiveState) have largely dropped BWidget in favor of the tklib widget package (which I'm the primary author for) that is snit (snidget) based, along with using newer core widgets. I do wonder the efficacy of a pure ttk TWidget ... done "right", it would remove a lot of BWidget cruft and look like tklib/widget. Of course you can just make it 100% BWidget compatible, but that seems to be what BWidget 1.9 already is. Jeff |