From: Koen D. <ko...@re...> - 2009-08-05 09:16:26
|
Harald, Another option is to simply add some files to the current BWidget sources, to support ttk. For example, there is scrollframe.tcl, and you could add a tscrollframe.tcl file which uses ttk widgets. This has the advantage that tk bwidgets and ttk bwidgets can be used in the same application, which would not be possible in your proposal. (And which is not even possible in the current half-working approach, since there is a single global BWidget::theme variable). Of course, this is not possible if you want (or need) to rewrite the complete framework (in widget.tcl). But in that case, maybe it would even be better to start from scratch and make a new CWidget package... :-/ Concerning compatibility: I agree it is hard to keep compatible with old Tk releases. I'm really used to operators such as {*}, eq, ne,... and I don't realize anymore they only exist since Tcl 8.5. I really think we should move forward - after all bug fixing on Tk 8.4 has also stopped. People who keep using 8.4, can also keep using BWidget 1.9. Regards, Koen Harald Oehlmann wrote: > Hi community, > > **I would apreciate, if a tcl-lib expert would answer the question at > the end of this e-mail** > > as announced in my email on this list: > Subject: [Tcllib-devel] BWidget verification, tagging and TBWidget > Date: 2009-07-20 > > it is planed to branch BWidget into two source trees: > - BWidget - use tk8.1 and later, no ttk code > - TBWidget - use ttk8.5 and later, no tk and tcl8.1-8.4 code > > Why two source trees ? It is a real split of scope. > BWidget is complicated enough. To support ttk and tk, many code will be > doubled. In addition, I don't want to drop tk8.1 compatibility, but many > things just would be more elegant and some work-arounds will go away. > > I am in doubt on the cvs level how to do this. > > Two alternatives: > > 1) use module bwidget and put TBWidget into a branch > > How to branch: > > cvs -z3 -d:ext:oe...@tc...:/cvsroot/tcllib rtag -b > -r bwidget-1-9-0 tbwidget bwidget > > How to checkout: > > cvs -z3 -d:ext:oe...@tc...:/cvsroot/tcllib > checkout -r tbwidget -P bwidget > > Advantage: all history kept > Disadvantages: > - No head revision for tbwidget > - Have to specify -r tbwidget on all operations for tbwidget > > 2) Create a new module tbwidget > > cvs -z3 -d:ext:oe...@tc...:/cvsroot/tcllib import > tbwidget oehhar tbwidget > > Advantage: Own head revision for BWidget and TBWidget, much clearer > Disadvantage: file history lost for TBWidget > > 3) do something else ??? > Other ideas ? Migrate to subversion where this is not an issue ;-) > > Properties of both solutions: > - No change for BWidget on the cvs level > > Thank you for any insights. > > Regards, > Harald > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Tcllib-devel mailing list > Tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcllib-devel > > |