From: Michał A. <ant...@gm...> - 2009-06-29 22:24:51
|
>>A graph with a Hamilton cycle is said to be /Hamiltonian/, so I suppose the term you were looking for here is "non->>Hamiltonian". That's right. Thanks. >>You've got maximum and maximal the wrong way round here. Finding one maximal (w.r.t set inclusion) independent set is >>easy (add vertices until you've covered the graph). Finding one that achieves the maximum cardinality is hard. Oh, I've mistaken the endings...AL with UM...sorry for confusion. >>Lars Hellström wrote: >>You've got maximum and maximal the wrong way round here. Finding one maximal (w.r.t set inclusion) independent set is >>easy (add vertices until you've covered the graph). Finding one that achieves the maximum cardinality is hard. >>Yes. I just googled for >> weighted metric k-center >>and found the PDF >>http://www.corelab.ntua.gr/courses/approx-alg/material/k-center.pdf >>which seems to be the basis of Michal description, it is very similar. >>And it also describes it as finding maximal, not maximum, the latter being NP-hard. Actually, my main source is great book written by Vijay V. Vazirani - Approximation Algorithms. That pdf is indeed very similar to what I've written, I think it's possible it was based on the book I mentioned ( all naming, as far I can see, is the same ). I think, except that confusion with accidentally replacing the endings, the rest of description was allright. Best Regards, Michał Antoniewski |