Re: [Tcllib-devel] FamFam icon sets as packages - Tklib candidate - Requesting Review

[Andreas K. <and...@ac...>]

Michael Schlenker wrote:
> Andreas Kupries schrieb:
>> Requesting review of a new module for tklib, before committing.

> Icons in tklib is a good idea.
> 
> Did you look at Adrian Davis ICONS package?
> http://www.satisoft.com/tcltk/icons/

No. I had forgotten that it existed. Thanks for reminding us of it.

... Ok, per http://www.satisoft.com/tcltk/icons/license.html
the code is BSD, and icons themselves are freely distributable.

Ok, one more thing for my todo list, review the API of this library.

(And I better write up my own ideas for the API as much as they have gelled 
since yesterday before I do that to actually have something to compare to).


 From the quick look ICONS has at least one thing Jeff wants and I had not 
cared about in my famfam packages ... Multiple themes, and standard icon names 
across themes.

> It might be good if those could coexist or maybe even use the same
> format/API.

Andreas.