On 1 Feb 2006, at 20:34, Mo DeJong wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:29:06 +0200 (EET)
> Kristoffer Lawson <se...@fi...> wrote:
>
>>
>> The current release version of jaclsh does not seem to give a
>> stack trace
>> on an error. Is there some obvious way to remedy this which I have
>> missed?
>> If not, will such a feature be appearing in future versions?
>
> Need more info. Are you talking about a Tcl stack trace via the
> errorInfo
> variable? Or are you talking about a Java stack trace from an
> unhandled
> exception in the main() thread? As far as I know, both of these work
> in the general case. There are some cases where one method or another
> might catch exceptions and not print them, if you could provide some
> specifics about the situation that would really help.
A Tcl stack trace. I ran a script with jaclsh and an error was given,
but the usual stack trace was not given.
/ http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/
|