tcljava-dev Mailing List for Tcl/Java (Page 9)
Brought to you by:
mdejong
You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(10) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(10) |
2002 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2003 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(8) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2006 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2007 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(5) |
2009 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-12-21 19:45:01
|
Ho Ho Ho! Tis the season for giving and because Jacl users have been very good this year, the gift of a shiny new compiler is now available via the tcljava CVS. The compiler is named TJC, which stands for Tcl to Java Compiler. The TJC compiler accepts Tcl source code as input and compiles Tcl procs into executable Java code stored in a Jar file. The compiler is accessed via a startup script named tjc. The TJC compiler is ready for evaluation by early adopters looking for significant performance improvements for Jacl scripts. Currently, scripts can be compiled ahead of time but there is no support for compilation of Tcl procs at runtime. A simple example showing how to use the TJC compiler is appended to this email. Many thanks got to AMD, New Iron Systems, and One Moon Scientific for funding this project. cheers Mo DeJong SIMPLE TJC EXAMPLE: In the following example, a TJC module containing a single Tcl script file and a single compiled proc will be created and loaded into the Jacl shell. This example makes use of the tjc executable and the TJC::package command. In this example, the Tcl source file used as input to the TJC compiler is defined as follows: $ cat simple.tcl proc simple {} { return "SIMPLE" } The user will now need to create a TJC module file for the TJC package. The name of the module file will be simple.tjc. The name of the Java package will also be "simple", this is the same package name that will later be passed to the TJC::package command. The SOURCE and INIT_SOURCE declarations will list only the simple.tcl file. $ cat simple.tjc PACKAGE simple SOURCE simple.tcl INIT_SOURCE simple.tcl OPTIONS Assuming that the tjc executable is already on the PATH, the TJC compiler is invoke via: $ tjc simple.tjc If no error is generated, then nothing is printed and the files simple.jar and simplesrc.jar are created in the current directory. Note that simple.jar contains both the compiled version of the proc simple and the script simple.tcl. This TJC package can be loaded into a Jacl shell by adding simple.jar to the CLASSPATH and invoking Jacl. $ export CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH}:`pwd`/simple.jar $ java tcl.lang.Shell At the Jacl shell prompt the following Tcl commands would be entered to load the TJC package and init the simple package. % package require TJC 1.0 % TJC::package simple % simple SIMPLE The example above shows how a compiled version of the Tcl proc named "simple" is loaded into the Jacl shell and executed. The results returned by the compiled "simple" command are the same as would be returned by the Tcl version of the command. |
From: Bruce J. <nm...@ma...> - 2005-09-20 11:32:53
|
I've found that when developing the code I just released that I had to rely on "artificial" benchmarks. Because most of my real code uses constructs such as "foreach", for which the body is not yet compiled, I wouldn't see any performance change in "real" code. Though ultimately any performance optimization scheme is irrelevant if it doesn't work well on real code, I'm not sure one can make substantial progress if one doesn't use simple benchmarks to understand where the performance bottlenecks are. As with Tom, I found a Java profiler useful The goal wasn't to try to eke out every bit of performance, but just to get some sense of which parts of the code were most important to worry about. I found the new profiler in NetBeans ( http://profiler.netbeans.org ) to work well. Bruce On Sep 19, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Tom Poindexter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:32:15AM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: > >> Tom, what kind of scripts/tools were you using to measure this 1.3 -> >> 1.5 >> speed improvement? I have not found much "demo code" that was easy >> to use with Jacl for the testing runtime performance issues. One >> could always >> write a small loop and use time {...} to measure it, but that does >> not really > > > I must confess, most of my timings were mostly artificial. Since my > goal > was to cache TclParse (and thus TclToken) objects per proc, the tests > that > I used defined one or more procs and invoked those procs in for loops. > Certainly not real world examples, but good enough to get some > preliminary > results. > > I did use a Java profiler, JMP, to get the idea of caching TclParse. > I ran > the Jacl test suite, some of my real code, and some of my contrived > examples under the profiler. This gave me the idea for caching > TclParse > objects. > > Perhaps TclBench has some tests we can use? > > > -- > Tom Poindexter > tpo...@ny... > http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your > very > own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: > http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > tcljava-dev mailing list > tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcljava-dev > Bruce A. Johnson, President One Moon Scientific, Inc. EDC III 211 Warren St Newark, NJ 07103 Phone 908 517-5105 Fax 908 517-5107 Email br...@on... Web www.onemoonscientific.com |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-09-20 02:24:53
|
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:52:48 -0400 "Chang Li" <cha...@ho...> wrote: > The Jacl1.3.2 with JDK1.5 on msys Windows XP. > make install generated errors: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: tcl/lang/Shell > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > tcl.lang.Interp.setVar( > Ljava/lang/String; Ljava/lang/String;I)V at > tcl.lang.Shell.main(Shell.java:76) Could this have been caused by running configure without a --prefix argument? A user ran into the problem and posted a note about it on tcljava-user recently. The fix is to pass --prefix=/usr/local or whatever to the configure script. Mo DeJong |
From: Tom P. <tpo...@ny...> - 2005-09-19 20:30:49
|
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:32:15AM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: > Tom, what kind of scripts/tools were you using to measure this 1.3 -> 1.5 > speed improvement? I have not found much "demo code" that was easy > to use with Jacl for the testing runtime performance issues. One could always > write a small loop and use time {...} to measure it, but that does not really I must confess, most of my timings were mostly artificial. Since my goal was to cache TclParse (and thus TclToken) objects per proc, the tests that I used defined one or more procs and invoked those procs in for loops. Certainly not real world examples, but good enough to get some preliminary results. I did use a Java profiler, JMP, to get the idea of caching TclParse. I ran the Jacl test suite, some of my real code, and some of my contrived examples under the profiler. This gave me the idea for caching TclParse objects. Perhaps TclBench has some tests we can use? -- Tom Poindexter tpo...@ny... http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-09-19 18:30:05
|
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:06:33 -0600 Tom Poindexter <tpo...@ny...> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:34:58PM -0400, Bruce Johnson wrote: > > > I'll be posting the code shortly at my web site, but if anyone would > > like it sooner just email me > > and I'll send you a copy (the compressed code is only 46Kb). > > It consists of 11 modified or new Java source files that can just be > > > Bruce, this looks cool! Please send me a copy. > > I started a small 'performance' project, trying to cache the parsed TclParse > objects per each Procedure, mapping them to the character offset in each > proc body. This turned out not to have a great performance impact, only > about 1.3 - 1.5 increase. There's still quite a bit of overhead in > Parser.evalTokens(). Oh well, nice experiment anyway. Tom, what kind of scripts/tools were you using to measure this 1.3 -> 1.5 speed improvement? I have not found much "demo code" that was easy to use with Jacl for the testing runtime performance issues. One could always write a small loop and use time {...} to measure it, but that does not really work like "real world" Jacl code. I guess what I am really looking for is some number of Jacl examples that do more than just a simple loop and yet can easily be used outside of other code to test the Jacl runtime impl. Mo DeJong |
From: Bruce J. <nm...@ma...> - 2005-09-19 15:15:47
|
cheers, Bruce On Sep 19, 2005, at 11:06 AM, Tom Poindexter wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:34:58PM -0400, Bruce Johnson wrote: > >> I'll be posting the code shortly at my web site, but if anyone would >> like it sooner just email me >> and I'll send you a copy (the compressed code is only 46Kb). >> It consists of 11 modified or new Java source files that can just be > > > Bruce, this looks cool! Please send me a copy. > > I started a small 'performance' project, trying to cache the parsed > TclParse > objects per each Procedure, mapping them to the character offset in > each > proc body. This turned out not to have a great performance impact, > only > about 1.3 - 1.5 increase. There's still quite a bit of overhead in > Parser.evalTokens(). Oh well, nice experiment anyway. > > -- > Tom Poindexter > tpo...@ny... > http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your > very > own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: > http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > tcljava-dev mailing list > tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcljava-dev > Bruce A. Johnson, President One Moon Scientific, Inc. EDC III 211 Warren St Newark, NJ 07103 Phone 908 517-5105 Fax 908 517-5107 Email br...@on... Web www.onemoonscientific.com |
From: Tom P. <tpo...@ny...> - 2005-09-19 15:06:46
|
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:34:58PM -0400, Bruce Johnson wrote: > I'll be posting the code shortly at my web site, but if anyone would > like it sooner just email me > and I'll send you a copy (the compressed code is only 46Kb). > It consists of 11 modified or new Java source files that can just be Bruce, this looks cool! Please send me a copy. I started a small 'performance' project, trying to cache the parsed TclParse objects per each Procedure, mapping them to the character offset in each proc body. This turned out not to have a great performance impact, only about 1.3 - 1.5 increase. There's still quite a bit of overhead in Parser.evalTokens(). Oh well, nice experiment anyway. -- Tom Poindexter tpo...@ny... http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ |
From: Bruce J. <nm...@ma...> - 2005-09-19 02:35:02
|
Dear Jacl folk, I've been doing some work recently to prototype some methods for increasing the performance of Jacl. Originally I did a protoype that focussed on actually compiling Jacl code to Java byte codes. While this looked feasible it was quite complicated and looked like it would take quite a bit of effort to complete. I've spent some time recently looking at a different approach. This consists of compiling Jacl code to a series of Instruction objects which are then executed by iterating through the list of instructions and calling the "exec" method for each. The code is relatively simple and at present simple, artificial benchmarks are sped up by about 2-10x. For example: proc tproc {} { string length abc string length abc ... repeat to a total of 30 lines } is sped up 10x, with a StringInstruction that explicitly executes the "string length" command. proc tproc {} { set a1 duck set a2 $a1 set a3 $a2 set a4 $a3 set a5 $a4 set a6 $a5 set a7 $a6 set a8 $a7 set a9 $a8 set a10 $a9 } is sped up about 3x, and is ultimately limited by the lack of explicit optimization of local variable lookup. Implementation of a local variable table should substantially increase this performance. Note that these calculations are done after first executing the procedure multiple times. The initial speed increase is lower. I'm guessing this is an effect of the Java Hot Spot compiler. My company has some money available to fund some work on Jacl optimization and am currently considering the best way to proceed. The protoype work I describe here may not be the best solution and may not be developed beyond this stage. There are certainly alternative approaches. I thought I'd make this code available and get some feedback on it. I'd welcome opinions on whether people think this approach is reasonable. Note that the code is written simply to get a quick idea of the value in this approach and could be substantially rewritten. Also note that only the "if" and "for" flow instructions are implemented. Jacl code within loops such as the "foreach" command is not yet compiled so no performance increase will be seen. Running the test suite (with certain tests disabled) gives the following results: all.tcl: Total 4912 Passed 4565 Skipped 294 Failed 53 I disabled about 5 test files that caused the testing to crash and have not yet investigated the source of these problems. Note: running the code gives the following message when procedures are created: WARNING: This code running with experimental Jacl runtime compiler support! It is not now ready, and may never be ready, for production use! I'll be posting the code shortly at my web site, but if anyone would like it sooner just email me and I'll send you a copy (the compressed code is only 46Kb). It consists of 11 modified or new Java source files that can just be copied into the Jacl 1.3.2 distribution that Mo recently released. best regards, Bruce Bruce A. Johnson One Moon Scientific, Inc. EDC III 211 Warren St Newark, NJ 07103 Phone 908 517-5105 Fax 908 517-5107 Email br...@on... Web www.onemoonscientific.com More details on the methodology follow: Compilation proceedes by parsing Jacl scripts using code translated from the C version of Tcl. During compilation, instructions are added to a list of instructions. Instructions consist of Java objects that are instances of classes that extend an abstract Instruction class: static public abstract class Instruction { private String name = null; private int stackEffect = 0; Instruction(String name,int stackEffect) { this.name = name; this.stackEffect = stackEffect; } public String toString() {return name;} abstract int exec(CompileEnv env,Object instructions[], int iC) throws TclException; } Each Instruction class provides a concrete implementation of the "exec" method. For example, the PUSH Instruction: public static final Instruction PUSH = new Instruction("push", 1) { int exec(CompileEnv env,Object instructions[],int iC) { int index = ((Integer) instructions[iC+1]).intValue(); env.stack.push(env.literalsArray[index]); return 1; } }; More complicated instructions, for example, those that implement flow control extend the Instruction class. For example, the If instruction is implemented as follows (note that at present the expressions in the If command are not compiled, though the execution bodies are: class IfInstruction extends Instruction { IfInstruction(String name,int stackEffect) { super(name,stackEffect); } ArrayList branches = new ArrayList(); ArrayList expressions = new ArrayList(); void addInstructionBranch(ArrayList branch) { branches.add(branch); } void addExpression(String expression) { expressions.add(expression); } int exec(CompileEnv env,Object instructions[],int iC) throws TclException { int i = 0; for (i=0;i<expressions.size();i++) { boolean value = interp.expr.evalBoolean(interp,(String) expressions.get(i)); if (value) { break; } } if (i < branches.size()) { Object myInstructions[] = ((ArrayList) branches.get(i)).toArray(); execInstructionList(interp,myInstructions, false); } else { } return 1; } } At present there are only about 16 instructions implemented. Execution of a compiled script proceeds by incrementing through the list of instructions and calling the "exec" method of each. This relies on the simple use of Javas intrinsic method dispatch capabilities, rather than complicated if/then or switch statements. Actual Java source files used to implement the compiler/execution system are described below: src/jacl/tcl/lang/Procedure.java Modified to call compiler when procedure is created. If global Tcl variable CompileProc(procedureName) is present and set to false then the procedure will not be compiled. If procedure has been compiled, then when it is executed the compiled instructions will be executed. src/jacl/tcl/lang/VarType.java Used by compiler in managing variables, Note: there is no optimized support yet for local variables src/jacl/tcl/lang/Compiler.java Compiles procedures src/jacl/tcl/lang/CompileEnvjava Compilation environemnt. Containts subclasses for an Execution stack and Instructions to execute. Current instructions are: Instructions for manipulating objects on stack PUSH, DISCARD, POP, DUP, CONCAT, Instructions for invoking execution INVOKE, Instructions for moving stack elements between stack and variables LOAD_SCALAR_STK, STORE_SCALAR_STK, STORE_ARRAY_STK, LOAD_ARRAY_STK, LOAD_SCALAR, LOAD_ARRAY Prototype of a math instruction: MULT Flow control execution IfInstruction, ForInstruction Compiled Tcl commands StringInstruction (only implements "string length" at present src/jacl/tcl/lang/CTclParse.java Modified version of TclParse for use with Compiler src/jacl/tcl/lang/CParser.java Translation of Parser for C version to parse scripts prior to compilation the following are present, but not complete, functional or used yet src/jacl/tcl/lang/OperatorDesc.java Math and Boolean operators for compiling expressions src/jacl/tcl/lang/MathFunc.java Math functions for compiling expressions src/jacl/tcl/lang/ParseExpr.java Used to parse expressions src/jacl/tcl/lang/ParseExpr.java Used to compile expressions src/jacl/tcl/lang/CompCommand.java Interface for commands that are compiled (this is not now used, and may not be used) |
From: Tom P. <tpo...@ny...> - 2005-09-15 13:38:28
|
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:49:14PM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: > This message is to announce the availability of a > new Itcl port for Jacl. Jacl is a 100% pure version > of the Tcl scripting language. Itcl is an object > This software was made possible thanks to: > > AMD > New Iron Systems Most Excellent! I'm eager to try out the new code. Thanks to both you and the benefactors. -- Tom Poindexter tpo...@ny... http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-09-15 01:46:49
|
This message is to announce the availability of a new Itcl port for Jacl. Jacl is a 100% pure version of the Tcl scripting language. Itcl is an object oriented extension for Tcl. Itcl users will now be able to run Itcl code directly in Jacl. The Itcl port was implemented by Mo DeJong as part of a Jacl support and maintenance contract. Itcl 3.2.1 was ported from its original C source code to Java source code. A version of Jacl that includes Itcl support is available via the Sourceforge CVS. It can be downloaded via CVS with the following commands: CVSROOT=:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/tcljava cvs login (press enter at password prompt) cvs co tcljava Build and install Jacl in the normal way and then run "package require Itcl" to load Itcl commands into Jacl. This software was made possible thanks to: AMD New Iron Systems |
From: Patrick F. <pfi...@oz...> - 2005-09-03 07:44:34
|
I am interested. Send me the deets and I will try a Windows build. Patrick. > >Hi Mo, > >Remember I asked about creating an Eclipse plugin for TclBlend? Well, >I've successfully >created an Eclipse plugin. I was wondering if the TclJava developers >were interested in >my changes? > >My changes required very little changes to the TclJava code. >I also went ahead and updated the configure and Makefile.in files. Now >if a user uses >the --enable-eclipseplugin --with-eclipse=<ECLIPSE_INSTALL_DIR> then >they should >be able to build the Eclipse plugin. > >The Eclipse plugin requires that Tcl was built statically (i.e. >--disable-shared). This is so the >plugin does not have to rely on Tcl being install on the users system in >order to use it. It makes >is self-contained. > >The Eclipse plugin is two separate plugins: > >tcl.lang_1.3.2.jar >-and- >tcl.lang.<os>.<arch>_1.3.2/ <-- this is a fragment for the tcl.lang >plugin (platform specific). > >The fragment contains a lib/tcl8.4 directory and this is where the >init.tcl file wil be sourced >when the pluginin is used. > >Let me know if you're interested in having my changes. I've only tested >building the plugin on >Linux. However, I'm working on a Solaris test. > >Regards, > >Greg Pierce >LSI Logic Corp. > > > |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-08-31 22:30:49
|
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:49:31 -0400 Gregory Pierce <gp...@ls...> wrote: > Hi Mo, > > I'm not familiar with the tcljava patch tool on Sourceforge. Can you > point me in the right direction? See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/tcljava/ Patches go here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=313005&group_id=13005&func=browse cheers Mo |
From: Gregory P. <gp...@ls...> - 2005-08-31 19:23:34
|
Hi Mo, Remember I asked about creating an Eclipse plugin for TclBlend? Well, I've successfully created an Eclipse plugin. I was wondering if the TclJava developers were interested in my changes? My changes required very little changes to the TclJava code. I also went ahead and updated the configure and Makefile.in files. Now if a user uses the --enable-eclipseplugin --with-eclipse=<ECLIPSE_INSTALL_DIR> then they should be able to build the Eclipse plugin. The Eclipse plugin requires that Tcl was built statically (i.e. --disable-shared). This is so the plugin does not have to rely on Tcl being install on the users system in order to use it. It makes is self-contained. The Eclipse plugin is two separate plugins: tcl.lang_1.3.2.jar -and- tcl.lang.<os>.<arch>_1.3.2/ <-- this is a fragment for the tcl.lang plugin (platform specific). The fragment contains a lib/tcl8.4 directory and this is where the init.tcl file wil be sourced when the pluginin is used. Let me know if you're interested in having my changes. I've only tested building the plugin on Linux. However, I'm working on a Solaris test. Regards, Greg Pierce LSI Logic Corp. Mo DeJong wrote: >On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:49:30 -0400 >Gregory Pierce <gp...@ls...> wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>Does anyone know how I could create an Eclipse plug-in for TclBlend? >>I would want this plug-in to contain any required native shared >>libraries so that >>I could send this plug-in to anyone and they could use it without having >>to build >>and install Tcl on their system first. >> >> > >Really hard to do. You could build Tcl and Tcl Blend and zip up the >install tree but the trouble is that Tcl Blend depends on runtime >env vars to find the JDK that it is linked to. At runtime, it needs to >find jvm.dll and that means the PATH has to be searched. If you >knew the JVM location or the PATH that jvm dlls were found on, >then you might be able to do it. The trick will be getting all the >env vars setup correctly when the JVM process starts. The process >under Unix is the same except that you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH instead >of PATH (for Win32). > >You would have a much easier time setting up a Jacl plugin since >all that is needed is to add tcljava.jar and jacl.jar to the CLASSPATH. > >cheers >Mo DeJong > > > > |
From: Chang L. <cha...@ho...> - 2005-08-18 20:29:21
|
The Jacl1.3.2 with JDK1.5 on msys Windows XP. make install generated errors: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: tcl/lang/Shell Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: tcl.lang.Interp.setVar( Ljava/lang/String; Ljava/lang/String;I)V at tcl.lang.Shell.main(Shell.java:76) .... What is wrong? Chang |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-07-29 04:40:46
|
This message is to announce the new 1.3.2 release of Jacl and Tcl Blend. These releases are the result of efforts by Mo DeJong and the Jacl and Tcl Blend user community. The 1.3.2 release of Jacl and Tcl Blend are available for downloading at the following URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13005 The 1.3.2 version is a "production" ready release, it is considered stable enough to be used on an everyday basis. The code in this release is already being used by customers in production environments on a daily basis. What's New in the 1.3.2 Release? ---------------------------------- The 1.3.2 release includes a couple of minor new features and some important bug fixes. Tcl Blend now includes the file win/libjvm.dll.a, it is needed to build with some broken JDKs in a Windows environment. Running Jacl and Tcl Blend in a Windows environment is now easier as a batch file startup script is now installed as part of the default build. A pre-compiled Jacl release that includes only the files needed to run Jacl is now available. The jaclsh startup script now returns a non-zero exit status if some error was encountered while processing a script. IO support in the Interp class has been re-implemented so that it makes use of the new IO layer. Jacl and Tcl Blend can now be compiled in a JDK 1.5 environment. A number of tricky expr command number parsing bugs have been fixed in Jacl. Also, the classloader issues that made it difficult to run Jacl in certain environments have been resolved. See the new_features.txt and changes.txt files for more info. What is Jacl? ---------------- Jacl is a 100% Java implementation of Tcl 8. This allows Tcl to run in more environments and also brings the power of scripting to Java developers. Jacl implements almost all the features available in the C version of Tcl and is well tested. What is Tcl Blend? ------------------------ Tcl Blend is a Tcl Extension that allows you to have access to the Java VM from the Tcl interpreter. The goal here is to allow Tcl developers to write new Tcl extensions in Java rather then C or C++ for better portability. A developer can also load both Tcl and Tcl Blend into an existing Java JVM. Tcl Blend is known to work on Solaris, Windows 95/NT/XP, IRIX, and Linux. Other systems have not been tested but it should be easy to port Tcl Blend to any system that supports dynamic loading and the Java JNI interface. For additional information: --------------------------------- The primary website for Tcl/Java related information is: http://tcljava.sourceforge.net/ The README file included in the Jacl and Tcl Blend releases includes lots or additional information including how to sign up for the tcljava mailing lists. |
From: Neil M. <ne...@cs...> - 2005-07-26 01:41:47
|
This is the same problem that I reported a few days ago. Mo posted a patch to the list which fixes the problem. See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php? forum_id=3849&max_rows=25&style=flat&viewmonth=200507&viewday=21 Cheers, -- Neil On 26 Jul 2005, at 01:34, Martti Tienhaara wrote: >> 1. Call for testers for Jacl/TclBlend 1.3.2 pre-release (Mo >> DeJong) >> > > I get a problem with socket flush on the binary release version of > Jacl 1.3.2 on Fedora Core3, Sun Java jdk1.5.0_02. When I run the > identical sequence with Jacl 1.3.1 it runs fine. > > [martti@puppy jacl132]$ ./jaclsh > % set chan [socket localhost 51002] > sock0 > % puts $chan "hello" > % flush $chan > Exception in thread "main" tcl.lang.TclRuntimeError: > FlushCmd.cmdProc() Error: IOException when flushing sock0 > at tcl.lang.FlushCmd.cmdProc(FlushCmd.java:50) > at tcl.lang.AutoloadStub.cmdProc(Extension.java:144) > at tcl.lang.Parser.evalObjv(Parser.java:818) > at tcl.lang.Parser.eval2(Parser.java:1221) > at tcl.lang.Interp.eval(Interp.java:2222) > at tcl.lang.Interp.eval(Interp.java:2306) > at tcl.lang.Interp.recordAndEval(Interp.java:2361) > at tcl.lang.ConsoleThread$1.processEvent(Shell.java:321) > at tcl.lang.Notifier.serviceEvent(Notifier.java:444) > at tcl.lang.Notifier.doOneEvent(Notifier.java:585) > at tcl.lang.Shell.main(Shell.java:151) > > -- > Martti Tienhaara (ma...@da...) > DASH Software Ltd. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > tcljava-dev mailing list > tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcljava-dev > |
From: Martti T. <ma...@da...> - 2005-07-26 00:32:43
|
> 1. Call for testers for Jacl/TclBlend 1.3.2 pre-release (Mo DeJong) I get a problem with socket flush on the binary release version of Jacl 1.3.2 on Fedora Core3, Sun Java jdk1.5.0_02. When I run the identical sequence with Jacl 1.3.1 it runs fine. [martti@puppy jacl132]$ ./jaclsh % set chan [socket localhost 51002] sock0 % puts $chan "hello" % flush $chan Exception in thread "main" tcl.lang.TclRuntimeError: FlushCmd.cmdProc() Error: IOException when flushing sock0 at tcl.lang.FlushCmd.cmdProc(FlushCmd.java:50) at tcl.lang.AutoloadStub.cmdProc(Extension.java:144) at tcl.lang.Parser.evalObjv(Parser.java:818) at tcl.lang.Parser.eval2(Parser.java:1221) at tcl.lang.Interp.eval(Interp.java:2222) at tcl.lang.Interp.eval(Interp.java:2306) at tcl.lang.Interp.recordAndEval(Interp.java:2361) at tcl.lang.ConsoleThread$1.processEvent(Shell.java:321) at tcl.lang.Notifier.serviceEvent(Notifier.java:444) at tcl.lang.Notifier.doOneEvent(Notifier.java:585) at tcl.lang.Shell.main(Shell.java:151) -- Martti Tienhaara (ma...@da...) DASH Software Ltd. |
From: Neil M. <ne...@cs...> - 2005-07-22 10:25:17
|
Hi Mo, On 22 Jul 2005, at 06:25, Mo DeJong wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:45:12 +0100 > Neil Madden <ne...@cs...> wrote: > > >> % get wiki.tcl.tk 80 /4 >> Exception in thread "main" tcl.lang.TclRuntimeError: FlushCmd.cmdProc >> () Error: IOException when flushing sock0 >> > > Neil, could you try out the attached patch and see if that fixes up > the > problem for you? Yup, that fixes the problem. Cheers, -- Neil |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-07-22 05:24:35
|
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:45:12 +0100 Neil Madden <ne...@cs...> wrote: > % get wiki.tcl.tk 80 /4 > Exception in thread "main" tcl.lang.TclRuntimeError: FlushCmd.cmdProc > () Error: IOException when flushing sock0 Neil, could you try out the attached patch and see if that fixes up the problem for you? thanks Mo DeJong |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-07-22 04:50:01
|
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:02:32 +0100 Neil Madden <ne...@cs...> wrote: > Whoop, > > Forgot to attach the file. Here it is. Neil, thanks for sending this. Some of the jikes warnings can be ignored, but your note got me looking at the binary command and I found a couple of nastly format and scan bugs that needed to be fixed. Those fixes are in the CVS now thanks to you. cheers Mo DeJong |
From: Neil M. <ne...@cs...> - 2005-07-21 11:03:00
|
Whoop, Forgot to attach the file. Here it is. -- Neil |
From: Neil M. <ne...@cs...> - 2005-07-21 10:45:41
|
Hi Mo, I downloaded and built the jacl1.3.2.tar.gz on Mac OS X 10.4.2, with the Java 1.5 SDK installed. I get some "Semantic Warnings" on compilation. As there are a few, I've attached the output of "make", in case you want to look through them. When I run the resulting jaclsh, the only problem I notice is that any call to flush on a socket results in an error (same with close), e.g.: % proc get {host port path} { set s [socket $host $port] puts $s "GET $path HTTP/1.0" puts $s "Host: $host\n" flush $s return $s } % get wiki.tcl.tk 80 /4 Exception in thread "main" tcl.lang.TclRuntimeError: FlushCmd.cmdProc () Error: IOException when flushing sock0 at tcl.lang.FlushCmd.cmdProc(FlushCmd.java:50) at tcl.lang.AutoloadStub.cmdProc(Extension.java:144) at tcl.lang.Parser.evalObjv(Parser.java:818) at tcl.lang.Parser.eval2(Parser.java:1221) at tcl.lang.Procedure.cmdProc(Procedure.java:161) at tcl.lang.Parser.evalObjv(Parser.java:818) at tcl.lang.Parser.eval2(Parser.java:1221) at tcl.lang.Interp.eval(Interp.java:2222) at tcl.lang.Interp.eval(Interp.java:2306) at tcl.lang.Interp.recordAndEval(Interp.java:2361) at tcl.lang.ConsoleThread$1.processEvent(Shell.java:321) at tcl.lang.Notifier.serviceEvent(Notifier.java:444) at tcl.lang.Notifier.doOneEvent(Notifier.java:585) at tcl.lang.Shell.main(Shell.java:151) Cheers, -- Neil On 21 Jul 2005, at 02:55, Mo DeJong wrote: > Hello all > > I have been working on a new 1.3.2 release for Jacl > and Tcl Blend and it is at the point where some > testing help from interested developers would really > be useful. > > Here are the pre-release URLs, these urls will be > valid for about a week (today is 7/20/05). > > http://www.dubiner.com/~mo/handoff/jacl1.3.2.tar.gz > http://www.dubiner.com/~mo/handoff/jaclBinary132.zip > > http://www.dubiner.com/~mo/handoff/tclBlend1.3.2.tar.gz > > This 1.3.2 version includes a binary release of Jacl and > startup .bat scripts. There have been a number of > Tcl Blend fixes to get everything working with Tcl 8.4.11. > Other than that, this is a bug fix release. Note that to > build Tcl Blend you should use the cvs version of the > Thread package. > > Please post a note to the list if you run into any > problems. > > thanks much > Mo DeJong |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-07-21 01:59:18
|
Hello all I have been working on a new 1.3.2 release for Jacl and Tcl Blend and it is at the point where some testing help from interested developers would really be useful. Here are the pre-release URLs, these urls will be valid for about a week (today is 7/20/05). http://www.dubiner.com/~mo/handoff/jacl1.3.2.tar.gz http://www.dubiner.com/~mo/handoff/jaclBinary132.zip http://www.dubiner.com/~mo/handoff/tclBlend1.3.2.tar.gz This 1.3.2 version includes a binary release of Jacl and startup .bat scripts. There have been a number of Tcl Blend fixes to get everything working with Tcl 8.4.11. Other than that, this is a bug fix release. Note that to build Tcl Blend you should use the cvs version of the Thread package. Please post a note to the list if you run into any problems. thanks much Mo DeJong |
From: Tom P. <tpo...@ny...> - 2005-03-08 04:26:22
|
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:26:15PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote: > Funny you should mention this now, I just started on a project to do something > very much the same except that I am going to parse Jacl and write out .java > source code. Funny you should mention this, * 2. I too started on a similar project, but it's been on the shelf for quite a while. My idea was to write the entire system in Tcl, using 'parsetcl' (http://wiki.tcl.tk/9649), as the main parser, and a modified version of Nsync's (should ring a few bells, eh!) LL(1) parser to parse 'expr' expressions. Then compile the whole thing on the fly using my Hyde package. I had thoughts on generating either Java or C, depending on the actual runtime (using critcl to do the on-the-fly compilation for C). I had also modified Jacl to expose CallFrame and Namespace classes as public. Yeah, I realize that writing the compiler system in Tcl would be slow, but I was planning to write the compiler in a way to allow bootstrapping the compiler itself. I was also planning to impose some limitations on the compiler to avoid the sticky parts of compiling Tcl, such as assuming all builtin commands as immmutable, punting on 'trace', etc. I never got that far to worry about the actual implementation. Good luck, and keep us informed on your progress. -- Tom Poindexter tpo...@ny... http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ |
From: Mo D. <md...@un...> - 2005-03-07 23:21:09
|
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:10:54 -0500 vm...@en... wrote: > Thank you Mo DeJong for the reply. It helped a lot. However, I have a small > concern. What would happen to the tclparser when, in the process of parsing, > it comes across some Jacl constructs which are not found in Tcl (for example, > a command to access a Java library)? In that case, we might need to extend the > tclparser, right? The Tcl parser parses Tcl syntax. The Tcl commands defined in Tcl are not part of the syntax. So, Jacl commands will be parsed just like any other Tcl commands. cheers Mo DeJong |