Re: [tcljava-dev] Dynamic Languages on the JVM: The Future
Brought to you by:
mdejong
From: Bruce J. <nm...@ma...> - 2007-02-17 20:51:57
|
I've had some inquiries about access to Swank (Tk in Java) from other languages like JRuby. It might be interesting to think about what core features would make this simpler. I hadn't planned on attending Java One, but this sounds like an interesting event, so I may think about it. Bruce On Feb 16, 2007, at 9:11 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > (Hi there Tcl enthusiasts and Jacl devs! This is kind of a form > letter, > but I'm serious about getting this event together with devs from > multiple languages. I'd love to hear your thoughts on such an event > and > see if you'd be interested in attending.) > > Hello all! > > I am attempting to organize an outside event for JavaOne this year > entitled "Dynamic Languages on the JVM: The Future". It is my > intent to > have as many alternative (dynamic) language implementers together > in the > same place as well as Java and JVM developers and specifiers. This > would > be our opportunity to talk about areas that have caused us trouble, > features we'd like to see in Java or the JVM (or features we'd like to > remove) and other related topics. I really want to break down the > boundaries between the language implementations/implementers so we can > cooperatively work toward making the JVM a more dynlang-friendly > platform. > > Ideally we'd have as many of your core team as possible (or others, as > you see fit) in attendance. I'll be there, as will at least Tom Enebo > and Ola Bini of the JRuby team. I'm also reaching out to other > language > teams in hopes of having a really good cross-language discussion. > > The event would likely be hosted at a nearby hotel, bar, or > restaurant. > I'd like it to be pretty informal, but somewhere we can actually talk. > > It would help my cause to get this event organized (and funded) if I > could get a vote of confidence from likely attendees. Many high-level > folks at Sun have already voiced their approval, and I think this > is an > excellent opportunity for us to show that real cooperation between the > dynlang impls is possible and that it would be productive. > > Please feel free to reply on this list (assuming the owners don't > mind) > or in private if you have questions or to voice your opinion. This is > going to be a big year for dynlangs on the JVM, and we need to make > sure > things keep moving in the right direction. > > -- > Charles Oliver Nutter > JRuby Core Developer > Senior Staff Engineer > Sun Microsystems, Inc > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-js-engine mailing list > dev...@li... > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > tcljava-dev mailing list > tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcljava-dev |