Re: [tcljava-dev] Jacl Status Questions/Survey
Brought to you by:
mdejong
From: Tom P. <tpo...@ny...> - 2004-05-13 22:06:09
|
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:27:21PM -0400, Bruce Johnson wrote: > > I'm curious about the state of Jacl. I myself think it's the best > thing since sliced bread and am fairly committed to using it in some of Agreed. I seem to use Jacl quite a bit, but mostly in a testing and support role. It's invaluable for me in prototyping some Java code on the fly before committing the effort to solidify in Java. > my projects. On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be much activity > on the mailing list or cvs repository these days. I thought I'd see if > people would actually respond to a few questions. > > 1) Is anyone doing active development on Jacl itself? > I've posted a few fixes, and some feature 'improvements'. I think a few of fixes got in, but not my 'improvements'. My most recent patch, several months old now for a exception raising bug, is still not in CVS. > 2) Is anyone planning on doing development on Jacl in the future? > I'm not doing much 'core' work other than fixing bugs when I find them. I also pretty much finished up my 'hyde' extension, but haven't yet published the current version. Some other things I'd like to do are: - implement 'fileevent', 'lset', other newer Tcl commands. - port as much of tcllib to a 'jacllib' as possible. - drop in a new regexp engine, likely the apache/oro one with extended RE's. - experiment with a Tcl to Java compiler, I've started on some initial code. - profiling to find and hopefully fix some interperter hot spots. - create a 'Jaclkit' environment, that bundles Jacl jars + application source into a single .jar file, so you can 'java -jar foo.jar' to run your app. I remember that you were doing some compiler work, any progress on that? My compiler will require some minor changes to the core, simply making package level or private classes & methods public instead. Otherwise, I'm trying to write all of mine in Tcl, borrowing on others' nifty work. > 3) Is anyone actively using Jacl in projects? > Only internal projects, one with Swank :-). I mostly use Jacl for testing (JUnit is the wrong tool IMHO, but hard to convince the Java only crowd at my office.) I've built a set of Jacl scripts that drive performance testing of my company's J2EE product. > 4) Would anyone be interested in having some Jacl/Swank presence at the > upcoming Tcl/Tk 2004 conference (talks, tutorials, BOFS)? > I'd just like to make it to N.O. for the conference, it's a slim chance at the moment. Having a Jacl presence might make a slightly easier sell to my company to send me, but that's still a stretch for me at the moment. > 5) Any thoughts on promoting the use of Jacl? > In the open source world, releasing early and often seem to be one of the keys to exposure. Of course that means having a fair amount of time to devote to it, fixing bugs, adding features. I can't fault anyone else at this, as I myself can't devote much time. Not enough hours in the day to do it all. Perhaps some more noise on comp.lang.tcl from the Jacl folks. -- Tom Poindexter tpo...@ny... http://www.nyx.net/~tpoindex/ |