From: Steve B. <st...@pr...> - 2001-01-18 12:27:15
|
I would welcome some advice or shared experience as to the benefits or otherwise of running tclhttpd with threads enabled. Our intended use is slightly unusual: one instance of the server will run something like a normal website, with a software download available. Said software will then communicate with other instances with custom domain handlers to do all sorts of fancy things. There have been discussions over the past weeks and months in clt which have ranged from the performance hit on thread-enabled tcl, to possible flakiness of the implementation (do I remember this correctly?). Is there experience with tclhttpd in particular which would help us decide whether enabling threads would on balance be beneficial, and which release of tcl is considered most stable in this respect? Because the site in question is an entirely new (and rather different) enterprise, we don't have any sensible estimate of the hit rate we may expect. We would like to generate 100,000 initial contacts in the first year, which is peanuts I suppose in terms of normal dot.com activity. The conventional browseable part of the site has been designed for speed of access and simplicity of use. The software download is of the order of 1 Mbyte. The fancy custom domain handler stuff will spawn other processes and manage file transfers, but these files will be of the order of tens of kilobytes on any one occasion. I don't know if the above is enough to prompt useful comment - but the traffic on this list seems to me invariably helpfu, so I live in hope. |