#344 TIP#189: Tcl Modules

TIP Implementation
closed-accepted
7
2004-08-19
2004-04-27
Anonymous
No

Reference implementation
Logged by dkf

Discussion

  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Reference Implementation Code

     
  • Donal K. Fellows

    • labels: --> 39. Package Manager
    • milestone: --> TIP Implementation
    • assigned_to: nobody --> andreas_kupries
     
  • Andreas Kupries

    Andreas Kupries - 2004-04-30

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=75003

    Attached a tarball containing some timing data I made while
    writing the TIP. In the tar file the files are in a
    progression, with notes and results first, then working back
    through the result formatting, measuring times to setup.

     
  • Andreas Kupries

    Andreas Kupries - 2004-04-30

    Notes on timing, measurement of speed

     
  • Andreas Kupries

    Andreas Kupries - 2004-07-15

    Reference Implementation Code V2

     
  • Donal K. Fellows

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=79902

    Is this a *complete* implementation of the TIP?

     
  • Andreas Kupries

    Andreas Kupries - 2004-08-13

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=75003

    Ref implementation v2 should be complete, yes.
    What do you believe is missing ?

     
  • Andreas Kupries

    Andreas Kupries - 2004-08-13
    • priority: 5 --> 7
     
  • Donal K. Fellows

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=79902

    I was just checking to see whether you thought you had a
    complete implementation there. No point in my looking at it
    if you know there's missing stuff. ;)

     
  • Donal K. Fellows

    • status: open --> closed-accepted
     
  • Donal K. Fellows

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=79902

    This was all checked in by AKu

     
  • Daniel A. Steffen

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=90580

    added patch implementing default module path root customization in the
    unix buildsystem and use of this to add platform standard module path
    roots on macosx.

     

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks