|
From: Kevin K. <kev...@gm...> - 2025-11-04 16:11:55
|
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025, 09:57 Colin Macleod via Tcl-Core < tcl...@li...> wrote: > Also relying on an "unsupported" facility is fine for a prototype but > risky for production code. > If there is a significant gain to be had here, all it would take is a TIP to provide limited support for the assembler. The 'unsupported' is there because we don't guarantee that the bytecode language is stable - we're free to change it for performance reasons, or indeed for any other good reason. Anything adopted to the Core is free to use whatever internal APIs the maintainers choose. > |