|
From: Colin M. <col...@ya...> - 2025-10-20 16:30:58
|
I would say {=}{expression} is more Tcl-ish, though two characters
longer. It follows the precedent of {*}, and avoids the incompatibility
of $(expression). I wonder if that could also be implemented by a
simple macro-type substitution at the parsing stage, as Eric has
proposed. If {=} was TIP-ed I would happily withdraw my competing TIP 676.
Colin.
On 20/10/2025 16:11, da Silva, Peter J wrote:
>
> Obviously I think this is a great idea and I think anyone who actually
> uses $(thing) in production code is crazy, but when I brought it up it
> got shot down because it was apparently found in the wild in
> production code.
>
> Pity it didn’t get into 9.0 :) but this would be a good era to do it in.
> |