[Tcl-bugs] [Tk] (erikleunissen) tkt (Open): Tests event-9.15 and event-9.20 are broken, and fail on macOS/aqua when fixed

[<no...@tc...>]

Automated mail by fx, on behalf of no...@tc...

Ticket Change [618723f51b197e34ca0c47ae913b21bce5861d1b0e6e15ecf474fdd40e922f6f]
  [Tests event-9.15 and event-9.20 are broken, and fail on macOS/aqua when fixed]
  By      erikleunissen
  For     Tk
  On      2025-10-12T23:40:31.367
  Details https://core.tcl-lang.org/tk/tinfo?name=618723f51b197e34ca0c47ae913b21bce5861d1b0e6e15ecf474fdd40e922f6f
  Ticket  https://core.tcl-lang.org/tk/tktview/c494cc25c4afef0425273eee288a7e7b02d260e7

Changed Fields
  icomment: OK, Marc.

            In a new commit [6ec6391e21]:

            I removed the experiment from event.test.

            Regarding the test constraint, I see that the essential distinction is
            based  upon the numbers 24 vs. 25. I noticed that these numbers are
            the same as what's  returned as part of the variable
            tcl_platform(osVersion) for Sequoia and Tahoe,  which I used in the
            experiment to identify the OS.

            Therefore, I'm realizing/guessing that we maybe can use
            tcl_platform(osVersion)  as a basis, instead of a relatively costly
            invocation of an external process  ("uname"). I'm also guessing
            because I'm still confused about the systematics of  version numbering
            for macOS, mostly because of the values used for Github  scheduling:
            "macos-15" and "macos-26", which are different from 24 and 25.

            I now committed the constraint based on tcl_platform(osVersion), but
            could you please  check whether it's correct?
  login:    erikleunissen

------------------------------------------------------------
See Tcl/Tk development @ http://core.tcl-lang.org/
------------------------------------------------------------