From: Kevin K. <kev...@gm...> - 2025-05-06 18:35:10
|
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:25 PM Dipl. Ing. Sergey G. Brester via Tcl-Core < tcl...@li...> wrote: > But, especially following your arguments, one can then say - lets switch > `after` to mono-time by default (and provide `after -at` or `after -wall` > or whatever for wall time)... Just because related to your assumptions, it > wouldn't affect anything anyway (because "no long way jumps" is equal to > "mono-time runs almost synchronous with wall-time"). > My inclination is 'let's reserve script-breaking changes for major releases, preparing them with 'retroforward compatibility'. On the other hand, let's not go a quarter-century between major releases ever again. I don't know how we wound up trapped in that mind set; it was toxic. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin |