From: Kevin W. <kw...@co...> - 2025-05-01 15:22:42
|
<div><img width="1" height="1" src='https://fedbdhd.r.af.d.sendibt2.com/tr/op/hHMNplihRQsARzBjgIoWuxuDX-QKGeLfNptgsgzIm0XrTE-5VzUaEhF6VkAE896ecjCCvnVmitpHMQXgH71bHpPEYmebGk0kLV9TGPrCh0CECZ5Itm1mMsmXzIFYaCtRnJZ5Nm1r2SO8CG9Bscan2CtT3lQQOkFPt9ZX8tDuMR7v8KesuYA_lCRBAXJ7pf3zopI0kwEHQ9QsXFoP5xECPS4Soy9xCxNR' style='mso-hide:all'/></div>On 5/1/25 10:50 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote:<br/><br/>> There are 112 Tcl_CreateHashEntry() calls in Tcl<br/>> and 111 in Tk. Are you willing to help me with this<br/>> immense task?<br/><br/>My hands are full with a different project, so I will be unable to <br/>assist here.<br/><br/>I get it - the functions are too deeply enmeshed in the core to address <br/>in a feasible manner and the separate function is the cleaner approach. <br/>Just needed to better understand the scope.<br/><br/> |