From: Steve L. <st...@di...> - 2025-04-30 09:14:32
|
Further to what Pietro has said, I cannot see why a *nix variant (or even a Linux distro) should require two maintainers when that is the same number are required for Windows and macOS, both of which are quite different from a *nix/X11 platform. Surely it is enough for the test suite for a release to pass for a platform to be considered tested, irrespective of the number of developers? -- Steve On 30 Apr 2025 at 4:21 PM +0800, Pietro Cerutti via Tcl-Core <tcl...@li...>, wrote: > On Mar 13 2025, 11:53 +0000, apnmbx-public--- via Tcl-Core <tcl...@li...> wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.7K --] > > All, > > > > In Tuesday's online meet, the need for formally defining supported > > platforms > > was raised (triggered by Francois' post regarding macOS/XQuartz). As > > suggested by Harald, I've committed TIP 715 > > (https://core.tcl-lang.org/tips/doc/trunk/tip/715.md) as a starting point > > for discussion. I have no idea what to include for platforms other than > > Windows. > > I regularly test Tcl/Tk, and several other extensions on FreeBSD. I am > the one behind tc...@Fr..., and I maintain a lot of Tcl/Tk-related > ports on FreeBSD. > > I don't qualify as "At least two developers committing to development > and testing for that item", but I think as long as I'm around, we can > consider FreeBSD as "tested". > > As for CI, there's https://cirrus-ci.com/ which offers FreeBSD platforms > and can be integrated in GitHub, or we could use > https://github.com/vmactions/freebsd-vm/. Happy to help out setting that > up. > > -- > Pietro Cerutti > I have pledged to give 10% of income to effective charities > and invite you to join me - https://givingwhatwecan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Tcl-Core mailing list > Tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core > |