From: Dipl. I. S. G. B. <se...@us...> - 2024-11-19 00:08:42
|
Isn't that already in its FAQ: May I combine MPL-licensed code and BSD-licensed code in the same executable program? [3] Regards, Serg. Am 18.11.2024 23:31, schrieb Jan Nijtmans: > Hi all, > > Inside Tcl, some files have a different license. For example, > libtommath uses the libtommath licence, compat/dlfcn.h > also has a slightly different license. Inside wish, > x11/*.h also has a slightly different license. > > In order to fix bug [a8e4f76ce4] "load library (dll) from > zipfs-library causes a leak in temporary folder" I > found a useful library, which is under the MPL license, > which is - also - very similar to the BSD license. > > Question: can we approve the MPL license to be > used in separate source-files within Tcl? The exact > text can be found here: > <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/ [2]> > > 3.3. Distribution of a Larger Work > You may create and distribute a Larger Work under terms > of Your choice, provided that You also comply with the > requirements of this License for the Covered Software ... > > My conclusion is that - as long as the files MemoryModule.h > and MemoryModule.c are kept under the MPL and fulfill > the restrictions of this license (which they do), this doesn't > impose any restrictions on the rest of the software. > > Regards, > Jan Nijtmans > > _______________________________________________ > Tcl-Core mailing list > Tcl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core [1] Links: ------ [1] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core [2] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/ [3] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/#mpl-bsd-and-apache |