From: Kevin W. <kw...@co...> - 2024-11-06 21:08:47
|
<div><img width="1" height="1" src='https://fedbdhd.r.bh.d.sendibt3.com/tr/op/rdwe2XDx4Ud7y0e8TiwNWhjomL3yG8YDT8qsyqVIuFOxVKDZXM-7e_GlHZEK1Of5uOEewdeUhFVdlgvldAQ3QqLX7PAIrO74eD8L3JdItAVnW1aR6LoXgpZGAmMFrW38K1MOdvliVekMz4s4o_jLGVpOSLE7l8kCU3pbv4A03WnesZoho95jDdgN8K6neLCQaPqRB8_spzl2tvWojJotQtFyh3cqdqWG' /></div>But what organization would take that risk?<br/><br/>> On Nov 6, 2024, at 3:52 PM, Poor Yorick <org...@po...> wrote:<br/>> <br/>> A work that included Tcllib wholesale, but did not then itself use any GPL<br/>> licensed code from Tcllib, would not be de-facto in breach of the GPL. The<br/>> only way the work would be considered derivative is if it depended functionally<br/>> on code licensed under the GPL<br/> |