From: Kevin K. <kev...@gm...> - 2024-10-18 16:06:17
|
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:36 AM Marc Culler <cul...@gm...> wrote: > I have no idea what the item "factor out the image command from Tk" is > about, nor why one would want to do that. What is the issue? It seems like > something that should be discussed here before it is discussed on zoom, > which reaches many fewer people. > > I have had a number of apps over the years that want to do 'headless' image processing. Either they are sending images to a destination other than a graphical user interface (for example, printing), or they are accepting images from an external source (such as a camera, X-ray, ultrasound, radar, ...) and performing analytics upon them. But at the root, there's still an 'image' object - an array of pixels. Much of what's in the [image] command is dealing with file formats, memory management, and the like, without reference to a GUI. I think that refactoring that portion out and making it available to non-GUI applications could be a significant step forward. Whether now is the time to discuss it (relative to the release schedule) is a question that I'll leave to others. -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin |