From: Colin M. <col...@ya...> - 2024-07-25 06:42:35
|
Hello All, I will try to respond to Steve's points: On 24/07/2024 02:56, Steve Landers wrote: > I should clarify that I am not advocating for any specific logo, just > saying that if we are talking about a new logo we should: > > * consider whether the feather is a positive or negative > For people not already "in the know" I think it's unhelpful. But some people are attached to it, and there is some value in continuity. So ideally I would include it, but de-emphasised, not the central feature. > * get a professional designer involved if possible > Ok but who is going to organise this and pay for it? > > * give a brief that recognises the target audience and the message > we want to convey > The logo audience is anyone concerned with programming - amateur, professional, or manager of professionals, whether previously aware of Tcl or not. I think we want to project a clear and distinctive identity. I would try to incorporate the idea of a set of tools, or kit of parts for construction. To my mind the designs from Tim Hartford go too far in the direction of bland corporate anonymity, which would not impress a technical audience. > > * expect this to be a divisive topic because logo design is very > subjective > Indeed, but the launch of Tcl9 will be a good opportunity to update our image generally. So if we can come up with something that's agreed to be an improvement, now would be a good time. Colin. |