[TCLCORE] Re: VOTE: maintainers and patches

[Andreas K. <a.k...@we...>]

> The voting period for the maintainers and patches proposal is now over.
> Here are the results:
> 
> Strict proposal:
>      Prefer - 3 (Nijtmans, Ousterhout, Hobbs)
>      Yes -    9 (Kupries, Welch, Ingham, McLennan, Porter, DeJong,
>                  Harrison, Fellow, Howlett)
>      No -     0
> 
> Relaxed proposal:
>      Prefer - 1 (Kupries)
>      Yes -    4 (Ousterhout, Nijtmans, Fellows, Hobbs)
>      No -     7 (Ingham, McLennan, Porter, DeJong, Harrison, Howlett, Welch)
> 
> If I have erroneously reported your vote, please respond ASAP.

I have DRH as Strict = Yes, Relaxed = Prefer in my notes [x].
Attached the mail I base this upon. He posted to TCT, not tclcore.
Just for completeness.

	** This does not change the outcome of the vote. **

[cc'd to Richard for verification]

> Otherwise the strict proposal is the clear winner and the relaxed
> proposal is rejected.  I will start integrating the strict proposal
> into the FAQ.

[x]

VOTE	Maintainers & Patches		{John Ousterhout}
			Strict	Relax	(Reasons for -, short)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael McLennan	+	-	(Maintainers out of loop for Relaxed)
Jeffrey Hobbs		++	+
Donal Fellows		+	+
Mark Harrison		+	-	(Refers to Jim & Don)
Brent Welch		+	-
George A. Howlett	+	-
Mo DeJong		+	-	(Experience from past projects)
John Ousterhout		++	+
Jim Ingham		+	-	(Not enough discussion pro/contra Relaxed)
D. Richard Hipp		+	++
Jan Nijtmans		++	+
Andreas Kupries		+	++
Don Porter		+	-	(Relaxed possible per CVS branches in individual cases)
Karl Lehenbauer		/	/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
			++3+10/1 ++2+4-7/1
			Strict is accepted.


-- 
So long,
	Andreas Kupries <a.k...@we...>
			<http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------