[TCLCORE] Re: RFC/PEP format

[Andreas K. <a.k...@we...>]

  
> > > Enclosed the most uptodate versions of the *rules .tcl files and some
> > > _drafts_ I am working on.
> > 
> > Do you have a document specifying the format of a TCT or is it simply
> > what you happen to have implemented?  :^)
> 
> As of now it is what I 'happen to have implemented', with all the
> incongruencies that come from such an approach (TCT- prefix, and not,
> ...). But when working on an adaption of
> 'http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0001.html' for our needs the
> section 'PEP Style' brought it home that I should (start to) do
> this. Any ideas for the normalization and/or optimization of the
> commands ?

Well, I played with the commands a bit, tried to make them more
regular, remove redundancies, etc. The result enclosed.

The file 'commands' contains a list of the commands as they could be,
although without much description. Also contains ultra-short
consideration of alternate syntax for some commands.

	foo.ex - Rewrote 0 to 2 to conform to the new commands.
	fooalt.ex - Same as above, but using some of the alternate
		commands.

	IMHO the alternate sources seem to be more readable.

 
> This documententation could be TCTD 3 (Number 2 should be the adapted
> PEP 1). Ne TCTD, this is a shortcut of 'Tcl Core Team Document'. My
> current name for this type of document. I had no desire to use RFC or
> TEP (Tcl Enhancement Proposal). Other names ?

-- 
So long,
	Andreas Kupries <a.k...@we...>
			<http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------