Re: [TCLCORE] RFC/PEP format

[Andreas K. <a.k...@we...>]

 
> Although I am not on the core team, I would like to propose to them
> that a RFC/PEP system be put in place soon to allow RFC/PEP type
> proposals and discussions to begin.
 
> I thought the core team was ready to start recieving these messages,
> but Mark Harrison said in the news group that you are not:

Unfortunately true.
 
> (snipped from comp.lang.tcl):
 
> To start recieving RFCs I don't think there is too
> much work that needs to be done.
 
> The process used by Perl and Python is almost identical.
> You can read about them at:
> 
> http://dev.perl.org/
> 
> and
> 
> http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/
> 
> (please note that the first link in the list of
> PEPs is the PEP that describes what a pep is and
> how it works)
> 
> I would also like to suggest some type of semi-regular
> status update from the development team/core team to
> the community to keep them up to date, similar to this
> one in python:
> 
> http://starship.python.net/crew/amk/python/dev/
> 
> I would be willing to do the work to get a web
> archiving system in place similar to the ones used
> for the PEP/RFC sites used by perl and python
> (both pages are pretty simple) if the core
> team is ready for this to be setup.


Something like in the attachement ?  (Both 'expand' and TclHttpd
should be able to use the code, despite it being originally written
for expand).

 
> It seems like this is needed in the near term
> so that the development for 8.4 can continue
> as there are several proposals that currently
> are ready to be discussed.

Correct. And others ready to be worked on (like the SDK/Sumo).


> Thanks,
>   --Dan

-- 
So long,
	Andreas Kupries <a.k...@we...>
			<http://www.purl.org/NET/akupries/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------