From: Eric M. <er...@aj...> - 2000-07-23 18:46:55
|
I don't think it's necessary or advisable to make Tcl support 64-bit integers on a 32-bit platform. It seems like the amount of effort and the degree to which backwards compatibility would be affected does not justify the benefits. If you need 64-bit integers, you should move (or are probably already running on) a 64-bit platform. Our focus for extending 64-bit support in Tcl should be on making sure that Tcl works properly on 64-bit platforms. This means that code that uses integers as pointers, for example, has to be corrected to use real pointers (since pointers on a 64-bit platform are 64-bit, while integers are likely 32-bit). Similarly, code that uses integers for file offsets should use size_t instead, for the same reasons. This is really what the intention of the "improve 64-bit support" line-item on the 8.4 roadmap was referring to, I believe. Eric Melski The Other Tcl Guy ericm at ajubasolutions.com Ajuba Solutions -- The TclCore mailing list is sponsored by Ajuba Solutions To unsubscribe: email tcl...@aj... with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject. |