From: Ryan C. <sc...@ho...> - 2001-08-03 19:20:35
|
> At 2:18 PM -0400 8/3/01, Ryan Casey wrote: <snip> > >Does Mac Classic have virtual (disk cache) memory at all? Should I just > >give up and work on the OSX port (especially with OS10.1 coming out soon)? > > Yes - open up the memory control panel, enable virtual memory, set it as > high as you like and reboot. However all this is doing, is setting the > size of the single address space which all apps share on OS9 or earlier. > OS9 and earlier still have partitions and you would have to change that as > well. *sigh* Apparently I missed that section. I did see the part about how much physical RAM I had, but not the spinbox below... Anyway, it was 32 and I upped it to 100. I rebooted, and set my app to use 1000 (default) to 100000 (preferred) memory. I was then able to load 3 sets of 61 images...more than should be needed. Now, after I check tbcload to be sure it works, I should be able to release a Mac 9 version, and move on to finishing Solaris and OSX. Thank you! > Another thing to do is make sure you have MacsBug installed, then you > can do a "stdlog" command which will dump a fairly detailed machine state > to a log file at the time of failure. This includes a stack crawl and heap > dump which can be inspected after the fact. The 'hc' command can be > invoked to check heap integrity periodically also. For future reference, are these free? Do you have a location for them? I am really not a Mac person, I just managed to get one next to me to look at this, since people have been clamoring for a Mac port for a while. Ryan |