Re: [tclquadcode] tclquadcode - trunk is broken

[Kevin K. <kev...@gm...>]

Ok, thanks. I expect to get all the tests passing Real Soon Now, at which
point I'll land the callframe-motion branch. It's badly needed. There seems
to be a procedure size that makes LLVM fall off a cliff, and removing
callframe churn is necessary.

On May 29, 2017 6:50 PM, "Donal K. Fellows" <
don...@ma...> wrote:

> On 29/05/2017 18:23, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
>> I can see where this is going astray, but not what you intended in the
>> pre-callframe implementation. I'm hoping to avoid debugging it. I'll
>> keep developing on your branch and plan to backport into trunk as needed.
>>
>
> Oops. I put code in to check this, but forgot to actually stamp out the
> flaw it was put in to stop. I got fed up of undetected problems due to
> putting function types in where they really didn't belong (as opposed to
> pointers to functions, which are fine) but didn't do a basic rerun after
> putting the check in. Comes of working on a branch where I'd actually fixed
> it and then deciding that this was too important to leave on the branch. :-)
>
> Fixed trunk.
>
> Donal.
>