From: Harald O. <har...@el...> - 2012-11-29 16:09:46
|
Thank you, Kevin, for the detailed answer. I used the wiki as primary information source. I tried to update it to reflect all this information... Am 29.11.2012 15:31, schrieb Kevin Kenny: > On 11/29/2012 08:11 AM, Harald Oehlmann wrote: >> I wondered about the odbc implementation and the metadata query commands. >> I understood, that each driver may return different dict keys. > So you will see additional columns in the results returned from the > introspection commands. TIP 308's list is the minimal set. Thank you, now, as I found the docs and tip350, the image is clearer. It might be helpful, if there would also be a minimal set for the tables subcommand. At least the tableSchma might be standardised. >> Why is the ODBC driver not usable with tcl8.5 but the other drivers are? > I'd be willing to help guide a programmer who wants to rework a version > 0.18 of the drivers to build and execute against 8.5 (point out what in > the code has to change, and so on...) but at present I don't have the > bandwidth to take it on myself. This is one of several ODBC projects in > need of an implementor. (I'd like to see the Oracle driver finished, > have a driver for the SQL Server native API, and have a C version of > the SQLite3 driver - the Tcl version that we have is pretty slow and > has a couple of unfixable bugs.) Thank you for the clarification. As I tried many times to compile tdbc for tcl8.5, I have at least an explanation why it does not work. I don't want to work on the drivers, enough building sites already (as you) and only little know-how... But I have put your answer on the wiki to eventually inform others. Thank you, Harald |