From: Alexandre F. <ale...@gm...> - 2009-09-15 22:47:37
|
Since the question is apparently too stupid to deserve an answer, and since the salient drawback of my proposal seems to be the stdout part, let's put it another way: Imagine one day we also want the refcount. What would be best: (a) yet another primitive [refcount] alongside [representation] (b) an evolution of the 'obfuscated' sentence so that it also gives the refcount -Alex |