From: David G. <dav...@po...> - 2009-03-08 00:07:58
|
Jeff Hobbs wrote: ... > +1 on this project idea, and note that the difficulty will be in getting > a consistently 'configure'able setup that detects the best policy on the > machine you are on. If you wanted the same advances on Windows, it > would be integrating davygravy's iocpsock work into the core. That > completely drops Win9x support, but that is fine in the 8.6 (even 8.5) > codebase. I'm alive, just busy with other stuff completely unrelated to programming. Help with putting ipv6 and any other new protocols such as IrDA, BlueTooth, IPX/SPX, Appletalk, etc.. into [socket] (if only a framework for the others) would be wonderful. And there is asynchronous multi protocol name resolution of all three types (static, dynamic, and persistent). The branch is still there, unfinished. Maybe I can get to it in a months time, maybe not... It really is a large project and way overdo. Getting win9x support back would require a second (or parallel switched at run-time) notification system based around WSAEventSelect() rather than completion ports. Most of the code could be shared as the concept of overlapped usage is the same. |