From: Daniel A. S. <da...@us...> - 2009-01-05 14:03:38
|
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 13:09, Jan Nijtmans <jan...@gm...> wrote: > 2009/1/3 Daniel A. Steffen <da...@us...>: >> (in particular compatible with autoconf 2.61, which some insist on using even though it was decided we could not switch to it yet...) to clarify, the fix in question was for compatibility with 2.61 _and later_, I wasn't advocating using 2.61 specifically. Last time we discussed updating past autoconf 2.59, there was opposition to the idea (c.f. bug tracker, re uintptr_t detection IIRC). FWIW I'm perfectly happy to stay at 2.59, it's trivial to install it locally if your system only has a later version... what I would like to see however is that everybody stick to the version we decide on, if you look at the recent history of tcl/unix/configure, it is full of 2000 line diffs from repeated back-and-forth between 2.61 and 2.59... Cheers, Daniel -- ** Daniel A. Steffen ** ** <mailto:da...@us...> ** |