|
From: Donal K. F. <don...@ma...> - 2008-12-14 23:06:12
|
Alexandre Ferrieux wrote: > It sounds valid. My only worry is that this strange lowercasing has > been in place since the beginning (see comments by 1.1 rjohnson). > Any idea why ? At a guess, this either was part of Tk 4.0 (as far back as I can remember there font name tricks being about) or came in with the new font system (don't remember when that happened). If memory serves, it is needed because font family names can be specified at the script level as all lower-case (common with names from XLFDs). I'm hesitant to change this code, not because I think what it does is right, but rather because I don't have any feeling at all for who and what would be affected. Forcing people to use a workaround who previously did not need to... that's a good way to get people to accuse you of breaking things unnecessarily. Donal. |