|
From: Alexandre F. <ale...@gm...> - 2008-12-08 17:22:10
|
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Donald G Porter <dg...@ni...> wrote: > > Or maybe I'm just making excuses because I can't keep up with the > flood. Not at all ! Your concern is perfectly valid, and now I understand that my [scan %i] idea was a nastily incompatible one. Thanks for clarifying this. I will update the patch tonight. In summary, what the TIP offers is: [format %#06b 5] ==> 0b0101 (NEW) [format %#o 9] ==> 011 (ALREADY) [scan %b 101] ==> 5 (NEW) [scan %i 0b101] ==> 0 (ALREADY) In all cases, it preserves the invariant: [expr "[format %#BASE $x]==$x"] regardless of how the base prefix is structured. Octal stands alone in its ages-old mud, but Still Works ;-) I would love to see you at peace with this instead of seeing it pass with the two-thirds part of TYANNOTT... -Alex |