From: Will D. <wi...@wj...> - 2008-11-26 01:22:51
|
On Nov 25, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Hobbs wrote: > Koen Danckaert wrote: >> Joe English wrote: >>> TIP#306: NO. >>> >>> This one does not play nicely with third-party widget sets or with >>> megawidget packages. For the former, it places additional >>> constraints on widget constructors. I have no idea how it will >>> interact with the latter, though I suspect the answer is "not very >>> well". >> >> When the TIP was first discussed on this list, Will Duquette (the >> author of Snit) said he would like to see it happen. I vaguely recall that; and Snit does indeed support autonaming of widgets using the %AUTO% syntax, e.g., [label $win.%AUTO%]. I don't recall ever looking at the syntax shown in the TIP, though; and using a single "%" character as the string to be replaced strikes me as asking for trouble. Will ------------------------------------------------------------------ will -at- wjduquette.com | Catch our weblog, http://foothills.wjduquette.com/blog | The View from the Foothills |