Re: [TCLCORE] CFV: TIP 210

[Donal K. F. <don...@ma...>]

Donald G Porter wrote:
> TIP #210: NO
> 
> I'd love to say yes, but I'm going to let deadline
> rush convince me to back garbage.
> 
> The implementation patch does not apply to the head.
> 
> Basic examination reveals that the patch does not
> implement what's proposed in the TIP.  Not even
> the subcommand name is the same.

Of course it doesn't. I fixed the TIP rather than futzing around with a
patch that's utterly wrong in many ways that were identified years ago.
If the TIP was of the functionality in the patch, I'd vote against it.

Donal.