From: <ke...@cr...> - 2006-11-03 14:37:42
|
don...@ma... said: > As far as I can see, there are effectively three, no, four choices: > 1: Reject any attempt to put anything like the 'platform' package > in/with the core. > 2: Wait for a solution that can perfectly identify all platforms that > ever might possibly exist. > 3: Accept Steve's partial solution on the pragmatic grounds of it being > good enough for most users at the moment. > 4: Sit on our hands. Donal, you and I are in violent agreement. (3) is the only sensible choice. Given the pragmatics, I'd like to see: 3 bis: Accept Steve's partial solution - augmented with some means of updating it outside the normal Tcl release cycle. and further: 3 ter: Extend the ability to update outside the release cycle to other volatile portions of the core, such as tzdata and msgs. and maybe even wrap this up as 3 quater: Sort out bundled packages so that we can define a "usual" mechanism for packaging "non-core" components that nontheless ship "with the core." -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin KENNY GE Corporate Research & Development ke...@cr... P. O. Box 8, Bldg. K-1, Rm. 5B36A Schenectady, New York 12301-0008 USA |