On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Massimo Manghi <mxmanghi@apache.org> wrote:
> Needless to say, if TCT decided that Unix fork (with the fork1 semantics) is
> fundamentally incompatible with Tcl and hence assume to have complete
> freedom at creating ancillary threads that could be in any state by the time
> a fork is called we would take it into account.

Heh. If only that was an option ;)


warning users they're about to be caught by a tripwire made of threads/locks inconsistencies is always an option ;-) 

 
  -- Massimo