tbox-talk Mailing List for Telemetry Box
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
clameter
Menu
▾
▴
tbox-talk — General Discussion
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2003-03-04 19:39:14
|
See the problem description on http://telemetrybox.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allen Rapini" <ar...@be...> To: <tb...@te...> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: [Tbox-talk] netsaint access | I am very impressed with the tbox so far, and am considering moving it | to a more capable box, ot do some more testing. I have not been able to | access the netsaint portion so far, and would greatly appreciate a | pointer to the docs regarding user/password on the netsaint portion of | the tbox. | | Once again, a great job integrating all the "bits", and thanks in | advance for the help. | | Allen Rapini | | | | ------------------------------------------------------- | This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger | for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and | disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX | and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com | _______________________________________________ | Tbox-talk mailing list | Tbo...@li... | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tbox-talk |
|
From: Lucas A. <ad...@cs...> - 2003-03-04 18:19:06
|
The password is listed on the web interface. You can look in the netsaint cfg file for the password. > --Luke > --Computer Science Sysadmin, MSU Bozeman=20 > --admin(AT)cs.montana.edu 994-3931=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: tbo...@li... [mailto:tbox-talk- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Allen Rapini > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:57 AM > To: tb...@te... > Subject: [Tbox-talk] netsaint access >=20 > I am very impressed with the tbox so far, and am considering moving it > to a more capable box, ot do some more testing. I have not been able = to > access the netsaint portion so far, and would greatly appreciate a > pointer to the docs regarding user/password on the netsaint portion of > the tbox. >=20 > Once again, a great job integrating all the "bits", and thanks in > advance for the help. >=20 > Allen Rapini >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The > debugger > for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost = and > disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major = UNIX > and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com > _______________________________________________ > Tbox-talk mailing list > Tbo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tbox-talk |
|
From: Allen R. <ar...@be...> - 2003-03-04 17:58:52
|
I am very impressed with the tbox so far, and am considering moving it to a more capable box, ot do some more testing. I have not been able to access the netsaint portion so far, and would greatly appreciate a pointer to the docs regarding user/password on the netsaint portion of the tbox. Once again, a great job integrating all the "bits", and thanks in advance for the help. Allen Rapini |
|
From: Niels P. <npr...@we...> - 2002-12-04 10:33:10
|
Hi, is there a list of the standard passwords for mantis, netsaint etc. ? Thanks Best regards Niels ______________________________________________________________________________ Viren? Wir wissen nicht was Ihr Arzt empfiehlt. Wir empfehlen den Virencheck fur Ihre E-Mail-Anhange! http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021159 |
|
From: Timo S. <ts...@ik...> - 2002-10-29 01:52:35
|
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 03:36, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Once we get the basic stuff straight we will have time for that. recipes > are rather simple though and for now we can certainly do without that. > S and P support md5sums to verify the integrity of the sources used. Yes, recipes are simple but just a one character change in the source url to point to trojan instead could go unnoticed even if it was quickly looked at. I'm not expecting to get the signatures before basic stuff works, but I hope they would be there before more wider use. |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-10-29 01:36:47
|
Once we get the basic stuff straight we will have time for that. recipes are rather simple though and for now we can certainly do without that. S and P support md5sums to verify the integrity of the sources used. On 27 Oct 2002, Timo Sirainen wrote: > How about adding full support for GPG signed packages? Every package and > recipe file would be GPG signed by it's maintainer and by default > nothing would be installed if the signature didn't match an existing > known key. > > Preferrably also support GPG signatures for original source packages if > they're found, like: > > S ftp://foo/bar.tar.gz ftp://foo/bar.tar.gz.asc > > The signature in .asc file would then be verified to be signed with a > key which is signed by the upm maintainer. > > Other than that I like most of the design and ideas. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in > Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be > fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > _______________________________________________ > Tbox-talk mailing list > Tbo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tbox-talk > |
|
From: Timo S. <ts...@ik...> - 2002-10-27 20:31:01
|
How about adding full support for GPG signed packages? Every package and recipe file would be GPG signed by it's maintainer and by default nothing would be installed if the signature didn't match an existing known key. Preferrably also support GPG signatures for original source packages if they're found, like: S ftp://foo/bar.tar.gz ftp://foo/bar.tar.gz.asc The signature in .asc file would then be verified to be signed with a key which is signed by the upm maintainer. Other than that I like most of the design and ideas. |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-10-26 14:01:20
|
http://ibiblio.org/telemetry or http://telemetrybox.org/upm Note that this is in a rather very raw state right now. If you are not a developer I would not recommend trying it. |
|
From: Ben W. <ben...@ya...> - 2002-10-26 13:22:03
|
more then happy to test it. where is the link --- Christoph Lameter <chr...@la...> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Thomas Stocking wrote: > > > What about replacing Netsaint with the new Nagios > version? > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > Hey have not seen you around for awhile. The new > Telemetry/Linux > distribution has Nagios. Need help with testing and > bringing things up to > speed. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, > November 18-21 in > Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache > event to be > fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > _______________________________________________ > Tbox-talk mailing list > Tbo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tbox-talk __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-10-26 06:21:00
|
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, epsas wrote: > I am considering using Telemetry Box for a public computer lab I am > bottom-lining for the student community at the University of Hawai`i. > I am currently using Redhat 8.0 as the base operating system on these > machines. > In short, I am wondering if: > > - A tbox live CD would be capable of providing X11 plus a Gnome2 > desktop environment for a homogenous set of workstations? [The > workstations authenticate over NIS (or LDAP) and NFS mount their /home > directory. Our workstations are PIII-700Mhz with 128MB of RAM] A custom live CD would be able to do that. The default Desktop is KDE. Authentication via NIS/LDAP would require special configurations and packages. > - With UPM, is it possible to build a local binary repository (ala an > apt source) and perform network installations with custom compiled > packages? That functionality is part of upm functionality. upm builds will always save binaries in /var/upm/binary. Those can be made available on a mirror. See also the upm updatemirror functionality on http://telemetrybox.org/upm > o Part of our lab's mandate is to teach University and High School > student volunteers how to install and maintain Unix machines. The > 'fastest' installation procedure for Gentoo I found involves dd'ing a > bzip2 compressed image of the raw block device over ssh (we have a > homogenous network of P-IIIs). While this method may be less > time-consuming than a redhat kickstart, I felt this was not a suitable > introduction to GNU/Linux installations for newbies. SSH will slow you down because encryption wastes a lot of resources. Try doing the iso via a native RSYNC connection instead. > o "Bootstrapping" Gentoo + X11 + Gnome2 + Gimp is time consuming - > we did not want to run SysAdmin training sessions over the span of two > days. uPM can handle a mixes system partially build from source or prebuild. You may want to prebuild the big binaries and let the users build the smaller pieces so that they can learn how to build from source. > The current Redhat configuration is adequate; providing a modicum of > functionality for our users, and an acceptable ease of maintenance for > our admins. The keywords are 'modicum' and 'acceptable'. Redhat's > distribution historically suffers from a list of problems that are > only partly alleviated by apt-rpm and other third-party tools. I would be glad about any feedback or suggestion on how to improve uPM. |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-10-26 06:15:41
|
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Thomas Stocking wrote: > What about replacing Netsaint with the new Nagios version? > Thanks, > Thomas Hey have not seen you around for awhile. The new Telemetry/Linux distribution has Nagios. Need help with testing and bringing things up to speed. |
|
From: epsas <ep...@li...> - 2002-10-25 21:48:09
|
Aloha, I am considering using Telemetry Box for a public computer lab I am bottom-lining for the student community at the University of Hawai`i. I am currently using Redhat 8.0 as the base operating system on these machines. In short, I am wondering if: - A tbox live CD would be capable of providing X11 plus a Gnome2 desktop environment for a homogenous set of workstations? [The workstations authenticate over NIS (or LDAP) and NFS mount their /home directory. Our workstations are PIII-700Mhz with 128MB of RAM] - With UPM, is it possible to build a local binary repository (ala an apt source) and perform network installations with custom compiled packages? Thanks, Charles Paul (epsas) Background on our Lab: Gentoo Linux was used in an earlier configuration - but a decision was made to move away from Gentoo for a couple of reasons: o Part of our lab's mandate is to teach University and High School student volunteers how to install and maintain Unix machines. The 'fastest' installation procedure for Gentoo I found involves dd'ing a bzip2 compressed image of the raw block device over ssh (we have a homogenous network of P-IIIs). While this method may be less time-consuming than a redhat kickstart, I felt this was not a suitable introduction to GNU/Linux installations for newbies. o "Bootstrapping" Gentoo + X11 + Gnome2 + Gimp is time consuming - we did not want to run SysAdmin training sessions over the span of two days. The current Redhat configuration is adequate; providing a modicum of functionality for our users, and an acceptable ease of maintenance for our admins. The keywords are 'modicum' and 'acceptable'. Redhat's distribution historically suffers from a list of problems that are only partly alleviated by apt-rpm and other third-party tools. |
|
From: Thomas S. <tst...@in...> - 2002-10-16 17:15:07
|
What about replacing Netsaint with the new Nagios version? Thanks, Thomas Thomas Stocking, GCIA, GCIH Insync Communications, Inc. www.insynccom.com (415) 507-9267 |
|
From: Ben W. <ben...@ya...> - 2002-10-01 00:39:01
|
What do I need to modify to make snort work ? __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
|
From: Schwengels, W. <sch...@ks...> - 2002-09-27 07:06:42
|
Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Walter Schwengels System- und Netzwerkadministrator Kommunales Systemhaus Niedersachsen Ammerl=E4nder Heerstra=DFe 70 26129 Oldenburg Tel. 0441 973 53 14 Fax 0441 973 53 22 |
|
From: Luis-Alberto G. <lui...@ua...> - 2002-08-28 14:55:22
|
Helo, =09I can manage to upgrade tbox 1.6.1 automatically from the GUI Console.= =20 It tries to download the software from a location that is no longer=20 available telemetrybox.org/dists/testing/main/binaries-i386/... the option in /etc/apt/sources.list is deb http://telemetry.ort/ testing tbox main contrib non-free=20 non-US/main non-US/main non-US/contrib non-US/nonfree Thanks for your help --=20 Luis-Alberto Garc=EDa Luc=EDa Unidad T=E9cnica de Comunicaciones Tecnolog=EDas de la Informaci=F3n Universidad Aut=F3noma de Madrid http://rincon.uam.es/dir?cw=3D787332153320312 |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@na...> - 2002-06-21 13:00:46
|
Hi, I'm new to Telementry. I just want to introduce myself and get a feel for what goes on in this neck o' the woods. Regards... -- Steve Foy st...@na... |
|
From: Shaun M. <sh...@cr...> - 2002-05-26 04:36:51
|
The trends and statusmap cgi are not displaying the generated images with 1.6.8 The Netsaint 0.0.7 FAQ has a note about a possible cause. |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-05-13 12:42:20
|
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Mayron, Ran wrote: > It seems that quite a few people are looking to install Tbox on 'older' > PCs. what is the issue with creating boot disks for this new version? - > not everyone is a linux guru, but we would still like to take advantage > of Tbox capabilities and would like to use 'older' PCs.... Sorry, but the installation process is not Debian based. There is no easy way to generate boot disks. Bringing up a system from one of the rescue / boot disks available from a variety of other linux distros and then copying over the tree from the CD is the easiest way around it. Boot disks have caused so much trouble in the past and I do not have much time to spend on supporting the open source project. |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-05-13 03:56:13
|
There is no easy way to do it. You can copy the isolinux.bin from the /isolinux directory to a floppy and try it that way. Get any rescue disk and access the iso image remotely. Mount it as an iso9660 image and then just copy the tree with cp -a to the HD and run lilo on it. On Mon, 13 May 2002, Matt RobbMarkham wrote: > Hi Christoph > > My name is Matt and I am trying to install the latest version of tbox. > > My server was able to use the old version 1.2 from the cd image but is not > able to boot from the new cdimage. > > Please could you let me know if there are any boot disks and or a how-to to > use the new image with an old bios. > > > Thanks for your help > > > kind regards. > > > Matt RobbMarkham > System and Network Administrator > Advanced Management Systems Ltd > > > |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-04-04 16:46:42
|
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Clark, Bill W. wrote:
> Last comment/question. I can't use apt-get because the NIC driver isn't
> available hence I am trying to find a way to get the kernel-headers so I can
> compile the NIC driver. The problem is that I am not installing the
> telemetry on a machine. I am booting off and running off the CD. The
> kernel-headers and driver are too large to put on floppy. And I wouldn't
> want to recompile the driver everytime we booted telemetry. Again I must
> emphasize I think this is a great product. I tried to do this with trinux
> and it is so undeveloped it is difficult to use.
Ohh.... Hmm...
> In case your confuse on the next section I copy your iso to linux
> workstation I have at my desk. Trouble with it is its not mobile. I
> thought I could extract your iso put my files in the extracted directory and
> then make another iso with mkisofs. The problem I have found is that the
> iso contains block device files. So when I mount the iso image and do a
> recursive cp it complains about the device special files. I can't find a
> solution to this problem. What I need is a way to inject my files into the
> iso or a way to extract the iso with the block device files intact. So far
> I am not certain there is a way to do what I want.
> If you have any advice how to tackle this that would be great. We are 98%
> there if I can just get the NIC driver to work then I will have a solution
> to running linux tools on our laptops in memory and off CD. Which would be
> ideal here. Since we are restrained to XP for other stuff.
If you have an existing linux installation then do the following:
1. Copy the iso image to the hd somewhere.
2. Mount the iso image using the loop device
mount -oloop whereever-it-is.iso /mnt
3. Copy the tree somewhere else
cp -a /mnt cdroot
4. Now you can run the CD environment using chroot
chroot cdroot
5. Use the networking of the host environment to install the
kernel-headers
apt-get update
apt-get install kernel-headers....
6. Compile and install your driver
7. exit chroot environment
CRTL-D
8. Rebuild the iso
mkisofs -R -l -o mytbox.iso -b isolinux/isolinux.bin -c isolinux/boot.cat
-no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table cdroot
9. Burn ISO image
10. Boot from CD on the other PC.
|
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-04-03 18:37:12
|
The 1.6.5 release has a 2.4.18 kernel. Install the kernel headers package. apt-get install kernel-headers-2.4.18-386 Then compile your driver on the box itself using the kernel headers in /usr/src. Install the .o file in the proper /lib/modules directory and you should be set. On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Clark, Bill W. wrote: > First let me tell you that what I have seen of your product is great. I > have tested it on a desktop and it works flawlessly thus far. However it's > not useful to me at work unless it's on a laptop. And as of 1.6.5 you don't > support the Intel(R) PRO/100 VE network interface on our laptops at work. I > tried compiling the intel driver and injecting it into the iso. But I get > unresolved symbols as I expected. Is there a way to compile a module for a > different system. I can't recall what kernel you are using but I believe it > to be a 2.4.x derivative. The linux box I compiled the driver on is a > gentoo linux distro using 2.4.17-r3. I compiled the module then copied the > e100.o onto the 1.6.5 iso and burned it but received the unresolved symbols. > There must be a way to generically use modules across systems. But I can't > find any help out there on the subject. > > Can you give me pointer on how to do this? > > Bill Clark > > Bil...@um... > |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-03-25 04:25:02
|
Feedback about the usefulness and how to improvie it would be appreciated. At this point this is mostly covering installation and basic operations. |
|
From: Christoph L. <chr...@la...> - 2002-03-20 16:50:13
|
There are no boot disks available. You could try to put isolinux from the CD onto a floppy and use that to boot from CD. See the isolinux pages http://syslinux.zytor.com. If CD is accessed via PCMCIA then the install will not be possible. On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 chr...@wt... wrote: > I do not have a cd-rom on a laptop I would like to install TelemetryBox > onto. > > Are there any boot disks available? I cannot find any. > > I would need the pcmcia and the dd disk so that I can install via NFS. > > > Thanks and I look forward to trying out TelemetryBox! > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Chris Brodie Phone: (519) > 882-4366 Ext. 260 > IS Coordinator / Network Admin. E-Mail: chr...@wt... > Waterville TG Ontario Plant > > > |